2026 NPPES data Hematology & Oncology Physician NPI 1043415961
Verify on CMS →

Tara Seery

Hematology & Oncology Physician in Irvine, California. This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers — including 11,215 in Hematology & Oncology Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration — see our methodology.

Federal data — no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is — no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
291
Medicare Part D claims · 74 beneficiaries · Hematology & Oncology Physician avg: 847
MIPS score
84.4/100
▲ 1 pts above national avg 83.1 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$8.6K
15 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Tara Seery reported a CMS MIPS final score of 84.4/100 — above the 83.1 national average — and filed 291 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

84.4/100
MIPS score · +1 vs avg
291
Part D claims, 2023
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) — no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Tara Seery's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023 — the federal quality measure

84 45th percentile higher than 45% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). This entry sits in this band. 90–100: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Tara Seery sits

This provider among hematology & oncology physician peers

Across the 4,233 hematology & oncology physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Tara Seery writes more Part D claims than 22% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 43% — placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.148.372.496.6Part D claim volume — percentile in specialtyMIPS quality — percentilePart D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality — percentile: 8Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality — percentile: 65Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality — percentile: 42Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality — percentile: 78Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality — percentile: 23Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality — percentile: 62Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality — percentile: 80Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality — percentile: 73Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality — percentile: 25Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality — percentile: 35Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality — percentile: 58Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality — percentile: 48Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality — percentile: 30Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality — percentile: 10Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 75Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality — percentile: 2Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality — percentile: 33Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality — percentile: 48Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality — percentile: 90Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality — percentile: 42Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality — percentile: 0Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality — percentile: 83Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality — percentile: 37Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality — percentile: 40Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality — percentile: 48Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality — percentile: 20Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality — percentile: 72Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality — percentile: 82Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality — percentile: 87Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality — percentile: 68Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality — percentile: 15Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality — percentile: 3Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality — percentile: 77Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality — percentile: 55Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality — percentile: 47Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality — percentile: 28Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality — percentile: 7Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality — percentile: 88Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality — percentile: 53Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality — percentile: 70Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality — percentile: 55Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality — percentile: 12Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality — percentile: 60Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality — percentile: 12Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality — percentile: 5Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality — percentile: 45Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality — percentile: 20Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality — percentile: 18Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality — percentile: 67Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality — percentile: 63Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality — percentile: 27Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Tara Seery — Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality — percentile: 43
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one hematology & oncology physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Tara Seery. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic — not verified)

Tara Seery practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting + 2 hospital affiliations — signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Tara Seery?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 06/20/2007

NPI 1043415961

Primary specialty

Hematology & Oncology Physician

Mid-sized

11,215 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

291 66% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 847

MIPS final score

84.4/100 1.3 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in California

How Hematology & Oncology Physician compares to other specialties among California providers

California providers

Largest specialties in California (% of in-state providers)

Behavior Technician — 17.3%Behavior Technician17.3%Marriage & Family Therapist — 5.5%Marriage & Family Therapist5.5%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program — 5%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program5%Mental Health Counselor — 3.9%Mental Health Counselor3.9%Pharmacist — 3.5%Pharmacist3.5%Clinical Social Worker — 3.1%Clinical Social Worker3.1%Hematology & Oncology Physician — 0.1%Hematology & Oncology Physician0.1%
Largest specialties in California (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance — MIPS

Tara Seery's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Hematology & Oncology Physician national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
84.4/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Hematology & Oncology Physician) — 84.4/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%84.4%
MIPS final score (Hematology & Oncology Physician) — 84.4/100 vs national avg 83.1

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Tara Seery appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Hematology & Oncology Physician provider at 16105 SAND CANYON AVE STE 230, Irvine, CA, 92618, with a listed phone of (949) 764-5347. NPI 1043415961 was issued on 06/20/2007. Because NPPES data is self-reported by the provider and refreshed monthly, the address, phone, and specialty reflect what Seery most recently submitted to CMS rather than a vetted directory listing, which is why patients should always confirm the practice is still at this location before scheduling.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 291 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 74 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $442K in drug spend, with an opioid prescribing rate of 5.5%. These figures capture only Medicare Part D — commercial insurance, Medicaid, and cash-pay prescriptions are not included, and any drug-beneficiary cell under 11 is suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 84.4/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 90.7, Cost 57.4), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Hematology & Oncology Physician is a mid-sized specialty nationwide, with 11,215 enrolled providers across 54 states and an average of 847 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist — always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

16105 SAND CANYON AVE STE 230
Irvine, CA 92618

Provider Details

NPI 1043415961
Specialty Hematology & Oncology Physician
Gender Female
NPI Issued 06/20/2007

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

84.4124
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
90.6795
Quality
57.3618
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Tara Seery bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" — a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Hoag Clinic
Newport Beach, CA
Immuno-Oncology Clinic Inc
El Segundo, CA

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) — CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Tara Seery. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$8.6K

Largest payer

SpringWorks Therapeutics, Inc.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias — they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

License & disciplinary context — California MBC 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only — NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~150K California medical licensees in 2023 — they are NOT specific to Tara Seery. To verify Tara Seery's current license status, search the MBC public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

576
Total board actions, California 2023
Across 556 cases
3.84
Actions per 1,000 licensees
California statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
186 cases

MBC publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the California disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

291
Total Claims
$442K
Total Drug Cost
74
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
328
Total Day Supply
7,471
Generic Drug Cost
$136K
Opioid Claims
16 (5.5% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
14

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
73.6 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
2.20
Gender Split
57% female / 43% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Tara Seery prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Creon
Lipase/Protease/Amylase
32
Eliquis
Apixaban
21
Prochlorperazine Maleate
17
Sodium Chloride
0.9 % Sodium Chloride
12
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen
Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen
11

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Hematology & Oncology Physician Overview

How Tara Seery fits within the Hematology & Oncology Physician landscape nationally.

11,215
Hematology & Oncology Physician Providers in US
54
States with Hematology & Oncology Physician
847
Avg Claims per Provider

Tara Seery's 291 claims are below the specialty average of 847.

Nearby Hematology & Oncology Physician Providers in California

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in California, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Seery.

Compare Hematology & Oncology Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry — providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the California medical board — federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Hematology & Oncology Physician peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only — they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Tara Seery's specialty?
Tara Seery specializes in Hematology & Oncology Physician and practices in Irvine, California.
How much does Tara Seery prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Tara Seery wrote 291 Medicare Part D claims totaling $442K in drug costs for 74 beneficiaries.
What is Tara Seery's Medicare quality score?
Tara Seery has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 84.4/100 (Quality: 90.7, Cost: 57.4). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Tara Seery located?
Tara Seery is located at 16105 SAND CANYON AVE STE 230, Irvine, CA, 92618. Phone: (949) 764-5347.
What is Tara Seery's NPI number?
Tara Seery's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1043415961, issued on 06/20/2007.
Does Tara Seery prescribe opioids?
Yes, Tara Seery had 16 opioid claims in 2023 with an opioid prescribing rate of 5.5%.
How many Hematology & Oncology Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 11,215 Hematology & Oncology Physician providers across 54 states in the US. The average Hematology & Oncology Physician provider writes 847 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Tara Seery prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Tara Seery's most frequently prescribed drugs include Creon, Eliquis, Prochlorperazine Maleate. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Tara Seery accept Medicare?
Tara Seery appears in CMS Medicare data with 291 Part D claims and 74 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Tara Seery's credentials?
Tara Seery's NPI is 1043415961. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) — 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.