2026 NPPES data Clinical Nurse Specialist NPI 1861915985 APRN
Verify on CMS →

Tara Sukut, APRN

Clinical Nurse Specialist in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 1,760 in Clinical Nurse Specialist, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
94
Medicare Part D claims · 42 beneficiaries · Clinical Nurse Specialist avg: 1K
MIPS score
89.9/100
▲ 6 pts above national avg 83.5 · Exceptional
Industry payments
$18.08
1 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)

What the federal data shows

Tara Sukut, APRN reported a CMS MIPS final score of 89.9/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 94 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

89.9/100
MIPS score · +6 vs avg
94
Part D claims, 2024
$18.08
industry payments (Sunshine Act)
≥56th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Tara Sukut, APRN

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1861915985), first enumerated 07/20/2017.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 94 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 89.9/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    2 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliations on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • Reported

    Industry payment transparency

    $18.08 in reported industry payments (1 transfers) in 2024 under the federal Sunshine Act — disclosed transfers of value, not a quality rating.

    Source: CMS Open Payments

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1861915985 · Clinical Nurse Specialist

NPI-10 · ENUM-RECENT · TAX-NARROW · MIPS-ABOVE · RX-TRACE · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1861915985
  • ENUM-RECENT 2017
  • TAX-NARROW 1,760
  • MIPS-ABOVE 89.9/100
  • RX-TRACE 94
  • BOOK-THIN 71 in Oklahoma
  • PHOTO-FINISH Evelina Kaminski · ±0.1

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Tara Sukut, APRN's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

90 ≥ 56th percentile 56% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). This entry sits in this band. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Tara Sukut, APRN sits

This provider among clinical nurse specialist peers

Across the 132 clinical nurse specialist providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Tara Sukut, APRN writes more Part D claims than 30% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 64% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.448.873.297.7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Tara Sukut, APRN, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 64
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one clinical nurse specialist peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Tara Sukut, APRN. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Tara Sukut, APRN?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 07/20/2017

NPI 1861915985

Primary specialty

Clinical Nurse Specialist

Niche

1,760 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

94 91% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,012

MIPS final score

89.9/100 6.4 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Oklahoma

How Clinical Nurse Specialist compares to other specialties among Oklahoma providers

Oklahoma providers
Case Manager/Care Coordinator9.6%Mental Health Counselor7%Behavior Technician6.6%Peer Specialist5.6%Counselor4.9%Student in an Organized Heal…4.2%Clinical Nurse Specialist0.1%
Largest specialties in Oklahoma (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Tara Sukut, APRN's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Clinical Nurse Specialist national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
89.9/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%89.9%
MIPS final score (Clinical Nurse Specialist) - 89.9/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

3300 NW EXPRESSWAY
Oklahoma City, OK 73112

Provider Details

NPI 1861915985
Specialty Clinical Nurse Specialist
Credentials APRN
Gender Female
NPI Issued 07/20/2017

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

89.8603
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
83.6335
Quality
65.9009
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Tara Sukut, APRN bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

OU Health Partners Inc
Oklahoma City, OK
Select Physical Therapy Holdings Inc
Stillwater, OK

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Tara Sukut, APRN. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$18

Largest payer

Chiesi USA, Inc.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

94
Total Claims
$36K
Total Drug Cost
42
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
109.2
Total Day Supply
2,889
Generic Drug Cost
$2K

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
67.4 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.46
Gender Split
60% female / 40% male
Age Distribution
<65: 12, 65-74: 24, 75-84: N/A, 85+: N/A

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

Drug Claims
Gabapentin
32
Methocarbamol
24

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Clinical Nurse Specialist Overview

How Tara Sukut, APRN fits within the Clinical Nurse Specialist landscape nationally.

1,760
Clinical Nurse Specialist Providers in US
51
States with Clinical Nurse Specialist
1,012
Avg Claims per Provider

Tara Sukut, APRN's 94 claims are below the specialty average of 1,012.

Nationwide Clinical Nurse Specialist peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Sukut, both outside Oklahoma so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (89.9 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2017)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Clinical Nurse Specialist Providers in Oklahoma

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Oklahoma, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Sukut.

One of 71 Clinical Nurse Specialist providers enrolled in Oklahoma, 5 are shown here.

Compare Clinical Nurse Specialist nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Tara Sukut, APRN's specialty?
Tara Sukut, APRN specializes in Clinical Nurse Specialist and practices in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Credentials: APRN.
How much does Tara Sukut, APRN prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Tara Sukut, APRN wrote 94 Medicare Part D claims totaling $36K in drug costs for 42 beneficiaries.
What is Tara Sukut, APRN's Medicare quality score?
Tara Sukut, APRN has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 89.9/100 (Quality: 83.6, Cost: 65.9). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Tara Sukut, APRN located?
Tara Sukut, APRN is located at 3300 NW EXPRESSWAY, Oklahoma City, OK, 73112. Phone: (405) 949-3129.
What is Tara Sukut, APRN's NPI number?
Tara Sukut, APRN's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1861915985, issued on 07/20/2017.
How many Clinical Nurse Specialist providers are there in the US?
There are 1,760 Clinical Nurse Specialist providers across 51 states in the US. The average Clinical Nurse Specialist provider writes 1,012 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Tara Sukut, APRN prescribe most often?
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Tara Sukut, APRN's most frequently prescribed drugs include Gabapentin, Methocarbamol. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Tara Sukut, APRN accept Medicare?
Tara Sukut, APRN appears in CMS Medicare data with 94 Part D claims and 42 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Tara Sukut, APRN's credentials?
Tara Sukut, APRN's NPI is 1861915985 with credentials APRN. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.