2026 NPPES data Women's Health Nurse Practitioner NPI 1710226204 APRN
Verify on CMS →

Tara Thompson, APRN

Women's Health Nurse Practitioner in Medford, Oregon.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 9,754 in Women's Health Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
533
Medicare Part D claims · 311 beneficiaries · Women's Health Nurse Practitioner avg: 269
Generic prescribing
83%
generic claims · 17% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
30.8/100
▼ 53 pts below national avg 83.5 · Below average

What the federal data shows

Tara Thompson, APRN reported a CMS MIPS final score of 30.8/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 533 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

30.8/100
MIPS score · -53 vs avg
533
Part D claims, 2024
83%
generic prescribing
≥3rd
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Tara Thompson, APRN

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1710226204), first enumerated 02/04/2013.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 533 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 30.8/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    1 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliation on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1710226204 · Women's Health Nurse Practitioner

NPI-10 · ENUM-MID · TAX-MID · MIPS-LOW · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1710226204
  • ENUM-MID 2013
  • TAX-MID 10K Women's Health
  • MIPS-LOW 30.8/100
  • RX-LIGHT 533
  • BOOK-THIN 123 in Oregon
  • PHOTO-FINISH Amanda Bell, RN, CNM… · ±1.2

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Tara Thompson, APRN's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

31 ≥ 3rd percentile 3% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). This entry sits in this band. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Above this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Above this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Above this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Tara Thompson, APRN sits

This provider among women's health nurse practitioner peers

Across the 795 women's health nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Tara Thompson, APRN writes more Part D claims than 88% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 0% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.448.873.297.7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Tara Thompson, APRN, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one women's health nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Tara Thompson, APRN. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Tara Thompson, APRN?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 02/04/2013

NPI 1710226204

Primary specialty

Women's Health Nurse Practitioner

Mid-sized

9,754 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

533 98% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 269

MIPS final score

30.8/100 52.7 pts vs avg

Below average band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Oregon

How Women's Health Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among Oregon providers

Oregon providers
Mental Health Counselor12.1%Massage Therapist4.8%Counselor3.8%Addiction (Substance Use Dis…3.5%Student in an Organized Heal…3.4%Clinical Social Worker3.4%Women's Health Nurse Practit…0.1%
Largest specialties in Oregon (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Tara Thompson, APRN's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Women's Health Nurse Practitioner national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
30.8/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%30.8%
MIPS final score (Women's Health Nurse Practitioner) - 30.8/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

1698 E MCANDREWS RD STE 400
Medford, OR 97504

Provider Details

NPI 1710226204
Specialty Women's Health Nurse Practitioner
Credentials APRN
Gender Female
NPI Issued 02/04/2013

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

30.8
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
0
Quality
86
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Tara Thompson, APRN bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Providence Health And Services Oregon
Medford, OR

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Tara Thompson, APRN - brand share 17.0%
Women's Health Nurse Practitioner average

17% brand-name claims vs 83% generic, on 533 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

533
Total Claims
$56K
Total Drug Cost
311
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
959.867
Total Day Supply
23,400
Brand vs Generic
17% brand / 83% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$40K
Generic Drug Cost
$17K
Antibiotic Claims
179

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
74.1 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.22
Gender Split
100% female / 0% male
Age Distribution
<65: 29, 65-74: 134, 75-84: 114, 85+: 34

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Tara Thompson, APRN prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Estradiol
119
Cefuroxime
Cefuroxime Axetil
59
Nitrofurantoin Mono-Macro
Nitrofurantoin Monohyd/M-Cryst
54
Gemtesa
Vibegron
47
Myrbetriq
Mirabegron
23
Solifenacin Succinate
22
Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim
Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim
20
Fesoterodine Fumarate Er
Fesoterodine Fumarate
18
Fluconazole
16
Metronidazole
14

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Women's Health Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Tara Thompson, APRN fits within the Women's Health Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

9,754
Women's Health Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
55
States with Women's Health Nurse Practitioner
269
Avg Claims per Provider

Tara Thompson, APRN's 533 claims are above the specialty average of 269.

Nationwide Women's Health Nurse Practitioner peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Thompson, both outside Oregon so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (30.8 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2013)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Women's Health Nurse Practitioner Providers in Oregon

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Oregon, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Thompson.

One of 123 Women's Health Nurse Practitioner providers enrolled in Oregon, 5 are shown here.

Compare Women's Health Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Tara Thompson, APRN's specialty?
Tara Thompson, APRN specializes in Women's Health Nurse Practitioner and practices in Medford, Oregon. Credentials: APRN.
How much does Tara Thompson, APRN prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Tara Thompson, APRN wrote 533 Medicare Part D claims totaling $56K in drug costs for 311 beneficiaries.
What is Tara Thompson, APRN's Medicare quality score?
Tara Thompson, APRN has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 30.8/100 (Quality: 0). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Tara Thompson, APRN located?
Tara Thompson, APRN is located at 1698 E MCANDREWS RD STE 400, Medford, OR, 97504. Phone: (541) 732-7400.
What is Tara Thompson, APRN's NPI number?
Tara Thompson, APRN's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1710226204, issued on 02/04/2013.
Does Tara Thompson, APRN prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Tara Thompson, APRN's prescribing is 17% brand-name and 83% generic drugs by claim count, with $40K in brand drug costs.
How many Women's Health Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US?
There are 9,754 Women's Health Nurse Practitioner providers across 55 states in the US. The average Women's Health Nurse Practitioner provider writes 269 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Tara Thompson, APRN prescribe most often?
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Tara Thompson, APRN's most frequently prescribed drugs include Estradiol, Cefuroxime, Nitrofurantoin Mono-Macro. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Tara Thompson, APRN accept Medicare?
Tara Thompson, APRN appears in CMS Medicare data with 533 Part D claims and 311 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Tara Thompson, APRN's credentials?
Tara Thompson, APRN's NPI is 1710226204 with credentials APRN. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.