2026 NPPES data Physician Assistant NPI 1730779729 PA-C
Verify on CMS →

Theodore Anderson, PA-C

Physician Assistant in Grand Rapids, Michigan.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 156,084 in Physician Assistant, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
179
Medicare Part D claims · 126 beneficiaries · Physician Assistant avg: 832
Generic prescribing
94%
generic claims · 6% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
96.3/100
▲ 13 pts above national avg 83.5 · Exceptional
Industry payments
$14.69
1 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)

What the federal data shows

Theodore Anderson, PA-C reported a CMS MIPS final score of 96.3/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 179 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

96.3/100
MIPS score · +13 vs avg
179
Part D claims, 2024
94%
generic prescribing
$14.69
industry payments (Sunshine Act)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Theodore Anderson, PA-C

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1730779729), first enumerated 01/22/2021.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 179 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 96.3/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Industry payment transparency

    $14.69 in reported industry payments (1 transfers) in 2024 under the federal Sunshine Act — disclosed transfers of value, not a quality rating.

    Source: CMS Open Payments

  • State context

    State board disciplinary context

    Michigan statewide board action statistics are published annually — these figures describe aggregate state activity, not Theodore Anderson, PA-C's individual license status. Verify directly with the state medical board.

    Source: MI-BOM annual report 2023

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1730779729 · Physician Assistant

NPI-10 · ENUM-RECENT · TAX-MEGA · MIPS-ELITE · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-MID · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1730779729
  • ENUM-RECENT 2021
  • TAX-MEGA 156K Physician Assistant
  • MIPS-ELITE 96.3/100
  • RX-LIGHT 179
  • BOOK-MID 6,574 in Michigan
  • PHOTO-FINISH Jason Leigh, PA · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Theodore Anderson, PA-C's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

96 ≥ 82nd percentile 82% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Theodore Anderson, PA-C sits

This provider among physician assistant peers

Across the 26,497 physician assistant providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Theodore Anderson, PA-C writes more Part D claims than 42% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 84% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Theodore Anderson, PA-C, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 84
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one physician assistant peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Theodore Anderson, PA-C. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Theodore Anderson, PA-C?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 01/22/2021

NPI 1730779729

Primary specialty

Physician Assistant

High-volume

156,084 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

179 78% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 832

MIPS final score

96.3/100 12.8 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Michigan

How Physician Assistant compares to other specialties among Michigan providers

Michigan providers
Behavior Technician22.2%Clinical Social Worker5.7%Student in an Organized Heal…3.7%Social Worker3.3%Physical Therapist3.3%Pharmacist2.9%Physician Assistant2.3%
Largest specialties in Michigan (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Theodore Anderson, PA-C's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Physician Assistant national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
96.3/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%96.3%
MIPS final score (Physician Assistant) - 96.3/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

100 MICHIGAN ST NE
Grand Rapids, MI 49503

Provider Details

NPI 1730779729
Specialty Physician Assistant
Credentials PA-C
Gender Male
NPI Issued 01/22/2021

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

96.2712
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
87.8989
Quality

Reporting: Group practice

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Theodore Anderson, PA-C. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$15

Largest payer

Genentech USA, Inc.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

License & disciplinary context - Michigan MI-BOM 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~41K Michigan medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Theodore Anderson, PA-C. To verify Theodore Anderson, PA-C's current license status, search the MI-BOM public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

123
Total board actions, Michigan 2023
Across 120 cases
3.00
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Michigan statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
44 cases

MI-BOM publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Michigan disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Generic-heavy

Theodore Anderson, PA-C - brand share 6.0%
Physician Assistant average

6% brand-name claims vs 94% generic, on 179 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

179
Total Claims
$2K
Total Drug Cost
126
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
183
Total Day Supply
1,753
Brand vs Generic
6% brand / 94% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$253
Generic Drug Cost
$2K
Antibiotic Claims
69

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
62.9 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.50
Gender Split
61% female / 39% male
Age Distribution
<65: 55, 65-74: 38, 75-84: N/A, 85+: N/A

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Theodore Anderson, PA-C prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Cefuroxime
Cefuroxime Axetil
21
Ondansetron Odt
Ondansetron
17
Methocarbamol
12
Prednisone
12
Doxycycline Monohydrate
11

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Physician Assistant Overview

How Theodore Anderson, PA-C fits within the Physician Assistant landscape nationally.

156,084
Physician Assistant Providers in US
56
States with Physician Assistant
832
Avg Claims per Provider

Theodore Anderson, PA-C's 179 claims are below the specialty average of 832.

Nationwide Physician Assistant peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Anderson, both outside Michigan so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (96.3 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2021)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Physician Assistant Providers in Michigan

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Michigan, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Anderson.

One of 6,574 Physician Assistant providers enrolled in Michigan, 5 are shown here.

Compare Physician Assistant nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Theodore Anderson, PA-C's specialty?
Theodore Anderson, PA-C specializes in Physician Assistant and practices in Grand Rapids, Michigan. Credentials: PA-C.
How much does Theodore Anderson, PA-C prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Theodore Anderson, PA-C wrote 179 Medicare Part D claims totaling $2K in drug costs for 126 beneficiaries.
What is Theodore Anderson, PA-C's Medicare quality score?
Theodore Anderson, PA-C has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 96.3/100 (Quality: 87.9). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Theodore Anderson, PA-C located?
Theodore Anderson, PA-C is located at 100 MICHIGAN ST NE, Grand Rapids, MI, 49503. Phone: (866) 989-7999.
What is Theodore Anderson, PA-C's NPI number?
Theodore Anderson, PA-C's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1730779729, issued on 01/22/2021.
Does Theodore Anderson, PA-C prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Theodore Anderson, PA-C's prescribing is 6% brand-name and 94% generic drugs by claim count, with $253 in brand drug costs.
How many Physician Assistant providers are there in the US?
There are 156,084 Physician Assistant providers across 56 states in the US. The average Physician Assistant provider writes 832 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Theodore Anderson, PA-C prescribe most often?
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Theodore Anderson, PA-C's most frequently prescribed drugs include Cefuroxime, Ondansetron Odt, Methocarbamol. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Theodore Anderson, PA-C accept Medicare?
Theodore Anderson, PA-C appears in CMS Medicare data with 179 Part D claims and 126 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Theodore Anderson, PA-C's credentials?
Theodore Anderson, PA-C's NPI is 1730779729 with credentials PA-C. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.