2026 NPPES data Medical Physician Assistant NPI 1326081316 PA-C
Verify on CMS →

Therese Johnson, PA-C

Medical Physician Assistant in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 40,694 in Medical Physician Assistant, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
488
Medicare Part D claims · 328 beneficiaries · Medical Physician Assistant avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
94%
generic claims · 6% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
91.7/100
▲ 8 pts above national avg 83.5 · Exceptional

What the federal data shows

Therese Johnson, PA-C reported a CMS MIPS final score of 91.7/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 488 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

91.7/100
MIPS score · +8 vs avg
488
Part D claims, 2024
94%
generic prescribing
≥61st
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Therese Johnson, PA-C

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1326081316), first enumerated 06/14/2006.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 488 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 91.7/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    1 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliation on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1326081316 · Medical Physician Assistant

NPI-10 · ENUM-LEGACY · TAX-MID · MIPS-ABOVE · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-LIGHT · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1326081316
  • ENUM-LEGACY 2006
  • TAX-MID 41K Medical Physician
  • MIPS-ABOVE 91.7/100
  • RX-LIGHT 488
  • BOOK-LIGHT 672 in Wisconsin
  • PHOTO-FINISH Courtney Behrens, PA · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Therese Johnson, PA-C's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

92 ≥ 61st percentile 61% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Therese Johnson, PA-C sits

This provider among medical physician assistant peers

Across the 7,147 medical physician assistant providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Therese Johnson, PA-C writes more Part D claims than 59% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 64% - placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.949.974.899.8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Therese Johnson, PA-C, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 59 · MIPS quality, percentile: 64
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one medical physician assistant peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Therese Johnson, PA-C. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Therese Johnson, PA-C?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 06/14/2006

NPI 1326081316

Primary specialty

Medical Physician Assistant

Mid-sized

40,694 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

488 57% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,139

MIPS final score

91.7/100 8.2 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Wisconsin

How Medical Physician Assistant compares to other specialties among Wisconsin providers

Wisconsin providers
Physical Therapist5.5%Registered Nurse4.7%Pharmacist4.6%Student in an Organized Heal…3.4%Professional Counselor3.3%Speech-Language Pathologist3.2%Medical Physician Assistant0.6%
Largest specialties in Wisconsin (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Therese Johnson, PA-C's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Medical Physician Assistant national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
91.7/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%91.7%
MIPS final score (Medical Physician Assistant) - 91.7/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

3267 S 16TH STREET
Milwaukee, WI 53215

Provider Details

NPI 1326081316
Specialty Medical Physician Assistant
Credentials PA-C
Gender Female
NPI Issued 06/14/2006

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

91.7411
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
88.9058
Quality
70.3458
Cost

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Therese Johnson, PA-C bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Emergency Medicine Specialists SC
Neenah, WI

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Generic-heavy

Therese Johnson, PA-C - brand share 6.0%
Medical Physician Assistant average

6% brand-name claims vs 94% generic, on 488 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

488
Total Claims
$9K
Total Drug Cost
328
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
535.567
Total Day Supply
7,148
Brand vs Generic
6% brand / 94% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$5K
Generic Drug Cost
$5K
Opioid Claims
36 (7.4% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
176

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
69.1 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.41
Gender Split
63% female / 37% male
Age Distribution
<65: 79, 65-74: 130, 75-84: 91, 85+: 28

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Therese Johnson, PA-C prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Cephalexin
64
Prednisone
60
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen
Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen
30
Doxycycline Hyclate
26
Azithromycin
24
Naproxen
19
Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Potass
Amoxicillin/Potassium Clav
18
Fluticasone Propionate
11
Oxcarbazepine
11

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Medical Physician Assistant Overview

How Therese Johnson, PA-C fits within the Medical Physician Assistant landscape nationally.

40,694
Medical Physician Assistant Providers in US
55
States with Medical Physician Assistant
1,139
Avg Claims per Provider

Therese Johnson, PA-C's 488 claims are below the specialty average of 1,139.

Nationwide Medical Physician Assistant peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Johnson, both outside Wisconsin so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (91.7 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2006)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Medical Physician Assistant Providers in Wisconsin

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Wisconsin, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Johnson.

One of 672 Medical Physician Assistant providers enrolled in Wisconsin, 5 are shown here.

Compare Medical Physician Assistant nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Therese Johnson, PA-C's specialty?
Therese Johnson, PA-C specializes in Medical Physician Assistant and practices in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Credentials: PA-C.
How much does Therese Johnson, PA-C prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Therese Johnson, PA-C wrote 488 Medicare Part D claims totaling $9K in drug costs for 328 beneficiaries.
What is Therese Johnson, PA-C's Medicare quality score?
Therese Johnson, PA-C has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 91.7/100 (Quality: 88.9, Cost: 70.3). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Therese Johnson, PA-C located?
Therese Johnson, PA-C is located at 3267 S 16TH STREET, Milwaukee, WI, 53215. Phone: (414) 647-5203.
What is Therese Johnson, PA-C's NPI number?
Therese Johnson, PA-C's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1326081316, issued on 06/14/2006.
Does Therese Johnson, PA-C prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Therese Johnson, PA-C's prescribing is 6% brand-name and 94% generic drugs by claim count, with $5K in brand drug costs.
Does Therese Johnson, PA-C prescribe opioids?
Yes, Therese Johnson, PA-C had 36 opioid claims in 2024 with an opioid prescribing rate of 7.4%.
How many Medical Physician Assistant providers are there in the US?
There are 40,694 Medical Physician Assistant providers across 55 states in the US. The average Medical Physician Assistant provider writes 1,139 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Therese Johnson, PA-C prescribe most often?
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Therese Johnson, PA-C's most frequently prescribed drugs include Cephalexin, Prednisone, Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Therese Johnson, PA-C accept Medicare?
Therese Johnson, PA-C appears in CMS Medicare data with 488 Part D claims and 328 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Therese Johnson, PA-C's credentials?
Therese Johnson, PA-C's NPI is 1326081316 with credentials PA-C. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.