2026 NPPES data Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician NPI 1710220330 MD
Verify on CMS →

Thomas Copperman, MD

Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician in Seattle, Washington.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 303 in Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
752
Medicare Part D claims · 408 beneficiaries · Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician avg: 642
Generic prescribing
85%
generic claims · 15% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
58.2/100
▼ 25 pts below national avg 83.5 · Mid-tier
Industry payments
$259.57
11 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)

What the federal data shows

Thomas Copperman, MD reported a CMS MIPS final score of 58.2/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 752 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

58.2/100
MIPS score · -25 vs avg
752
Part D claims, 2024
85%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Thomas Copperman, MD

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1710220330), first enumerated 04/02/2013.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 752 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 58.2/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Board certification signal

    Heuristic suggests board-certified status based on ABMS-eligible specialty taxonomy plus active CMS participation signals — not a direct ABMS verification.

    Source: NUCC taxonomy + CMS participation heuristic

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    2 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliations on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • Reported

    Industry payment transparency

    $259.57 in reported industry payments (11 transfers) in 2024 under the federal Sunshine Act — disclosed transfers of value, not a quality rating.

    Source: CMS Open Payments

  • State context

    State board disciplinary context

    Washington statewide board action statistics are published annually — these figures describe aggregate state activity, not Thomas Copperman, MD's individual license status. Verify directly with the state medical board.

    Source: WMC annual report 2023

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1710220330 · Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician

NPI-10 · ENUM-MID · TAX-TRACE · MIPS-LOW · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-THIN · NEAR-MIPS

  • NPI-10 1710220330
  • ENUM-MID 2013
  • TAX-TRACE 303
  • MIPS-LOW 58.2/100
  • RX-LIGHT 752
  • BOOK-THIN 9 in Washington
  • NEAR-MIPS Jeffrey Peckinpaugh,… · 6.2

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Thomas Copperman, MD's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

58 ≥ 5th percentile 5% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). This entry sits in this band. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Above this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Thomas Copperman, MD sits

This provider among ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery physician peers

Across the 123 ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Thomas Copperman, MD writes more Part D claims than 62% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 7% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.949.974.899.8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Thomas Copperman, MD, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Thomas Copperman, MD. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Thomas Copperman, MD practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting + 2 hospital affiliations - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Thomas Copperman, MD?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 04/02/2013

NPI 1710220330

Primary specialty

Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician

Rare

303 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

752 17% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 642

MIPS final score

58.2/100 25.3 pts vs avg

Mid-tier band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Washington

How Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician compares to other specialties among Washington providers

Washington providers
Mental Health Counselor8.5%Massage Therapist6.4%Counselor5.7%Behavior Technician4.7%Pharmacist3.8%Physical Therapist3.6%Ophthalmic Plastic and Recon…0%
Largest specialties in Washington (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Thomas Copperman, MD's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
58.2/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%58.2%
MIPS final score (Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician) - 58.2/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

1101 MADISON ST STE 600
Seattle, WA 98104

Provider Details

NPI 1710220330
Specialty Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician
Credentials MD
Gender Male
NPI Issued 04/02/2013

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

58.1869
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
97.9612
Quality
70.9952
Cost
0
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Thomas Copperman, MD bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Evergreen Eye Center PLLC
Seattle, WA
Eye Associates Northwest PLLC
Seattle, WA

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Thomas Copperman, MD. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$260

Largest payer

SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES INC.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

License & disciplinary context - Washington WMC 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~34K Washington medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Thomas Copperman, MD. To verify Thomas Copperman, MD's current license status, search the WMC public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

88
Total board actions, Washington 2023
Across 85 cases
2.59
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Washington statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
31 cases

WMC publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Washington disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Thomas Copperman, MD - brand share 15.0%
Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician average

15% brand-name claims vs 85% generic, on 752 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

752
Total Claims
$22K
Total Drug Cost
408
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
789.667
Total Day Supply
12,342
Brand vs Generic
15% brand / 85% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$15K
Generic Drug Cost
$7K
Antibiotic Claims
22

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
76.3 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.06
Gender Split
64% female / 36% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Thomas Copperman, MD prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Erythromycin
Erythromycin Base
416
Neomycin-Polymyxin-Dexameth
Neomycin/Polymyxin B/Dexametha
114
Methylprednisolone
70
Prednisolone Acetate
47
Restasis
Cyclosporine
16
Bacitracin-Polymyxin
Bacitracin/Polymyxin B Sulfate
15
Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim
Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim
11

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician Overview

How Thomas Copperman, MD fits within the Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician landscape nationally.

303
Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician Providers in US
44
States with Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician
642
Avg Claims per Provider

Thomas Copperman, MD's 752 claims are above the specialty average of 642.

Nationwide Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Copperman, both outside Washington so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (58.2 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2013)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician Providers in Washington

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Washington, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Copperman.

One of 9 Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician providers enrolled in Washington, 5 are shown here.

Compare Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Thomas Copperman, MD's specialty?
Thomas Copperman, MD specializes in Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician and practices in Seattle, Washington. Credentials: MD.
How much does Thomas Copperman, MD prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Thomas Copperman, MD wrote 752 Medicare Part D claims totaling $22K in drug costs for 408 beneficiaries.
What is Thomas Copperman, MD's Medicare quality score?
Thomas Copperman, MD has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 58.2/100 (Quality: 98, Cost: 71). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Thomas Copperman, MD located?
Thomas Copperman, MD is located at 1101 MADISON ST STE 600, Seattle, WA, 98104. Phone: (206) 215-2020.
What is Thomas Copperman, MD's NPI number?
Thomas Copperman, MD's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1710220330, issued on 04/02/2013.
Does Thomas Copperman, MD prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Thomas Copperman, MD's prescribing is 15% brand-name and 85% generic drugs by claim count, with $15K in brand drug costs.
How many Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 303 Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician providers across 44 states in the US. The average Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician provider writes 642 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Thomas Copperman, MD prescribe most often?
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Thomas Copperman, MD's most frequently prescribed drugs include Erythromycin, Neomycin-Polymyxin-Dexameth, Methylprednisolone. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Thomas Copperman, MD accept Medicare?
Thomas Copperman, MD appears in CMS Medicare data with 752 Part D claims and 408 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Thomas Copperman, MD's credentials?
Thomas Copperman, MD's NPI is 1710220330 with credentials MD. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.