PlainDoctor

2026 NPPES data Plastic Surgery Physician NPI 1760464754 M.D.
Verify on CMS →

Thomas Dooley, M.D.

Plastic Surgery Physician in Reading, Pennsylvania.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 5,322 in Plastic Surgery Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
141
Medicare Part D claims · 78 beneficiaries · Plastic Surgery Physician avg: 84
Generic prescribing
92%
generic claims · 8% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
81.2/100
▼ 2 pts below national avg 83.5 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$76.51
3 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Verify NPI on CMS Methodology
Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

What the federal data shows

Thomas Dooley, M.D. reported a CMS MIPS final score of 81.2/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 141 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

81.2/100
MIPS score · -2 vs avg
141
Part D claims, 2023
92%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1760464754 · Plastic Surgery Physician

NPI-10 · ENUM-LEGACY · TAX-MID · MIPS-INLINE · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1760464754
  • ENUM-LEGACY 2005
  • TAX-MID 5K Plastic Surgery
  • MIPS-INLINE 81.2/100
  • RX-LIGHT 141
  • BOOK-THIN 201 in Pennsylvania
  • PHOTO-FINISH Justin Bryant · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Thomas Dooley, M.D.'s MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

81 ≥ 32nd percentile 32% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). This entry sits in this band. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Thomas Dooley, M.D. sits

This provider among plastic surgery physician peers

Across the 534 plastic surgery physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Thomas Dooley, M.D. writes more Part D claims than 77% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 34% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.448.873.297.7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Thomas Dooley, M.D., Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 34
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one plastic surgery physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Thomas Dooley, M.D.. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

✓
Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Thomas Dooley, M.D. practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting + 1 hospital affiliation - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Thomas Dooley, M.D.?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 11/16/2005

NPI 1760464754

Primary specialty

Plastic Surgery Physician

Mid-sized

5,322 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

141 68% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 84

MIPS final score

81.2/100 2.3 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Pennsylvania

How Plastic Surgery Physician compares to other specialties among Pennsylvania providers

Pennsylvania providers
Student in an Organized Heal…5.6%Pharmacist5%Physical Therapist4.9%Mental Health Counselor3.9%Internal Medicine Physician3.3%Professional Counselor3.2%Plastic Surgery Physician0.1%
Largest specialties in Pennsylvania (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Thomas Dooley, M.D.'s 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Plastic Surgery Physician national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
81.2/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%81.2%
MIPS final score (Plastic Surgery Physician) - 81.2/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

40 KENHORST BLVD
Reading, PA 19607
(610) 796-1000

Provider Details

NPI 1760464754
Specialty Plastic Surgery Physician
Credentials M.D.
Gender Male
NPI Issued 11/16/2005

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

81.1913
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
74.5659
Quality
65.2384
Cost
97
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Thomas Dooley, M.D. bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Tower Health Medical Group
Wyomissing, PA

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Thomas Dooley, M.D.. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$77

Largest payer

LifeNet Health

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

License & disciplinary context - Pennsylvania PA-BOM 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~45K Pennsylvania medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Thomas Dooley, M.D.. To verify Thomas Dooley, M.D.'s current license status, search the PA-BOM public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

133
Total board actions, Pennsylvania 2023
Across 129 cases
2.96
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Pennsylvania statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
48 cases

PA-BOM publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Pennsylvania disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Generic-heavy

Thomas Dooley, M.D. - brand share 8.0%
Plastic Surgery Physician average

8% brand-name claims vs 92% generic, on 141 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

141
Total Claims
$2K
Total Drug Cost
78
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
144
Total Day Supply
1,445
Brand vs Generic
8% brand / 92% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$569
Generic Drug Cost
$1K
Opioid Claims
49 (34.8% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
47

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
76.1 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.30
Gender Split
67% female / 33% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Thomas Dooley, M.D. prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Acetaminophen-Codeine
Acetaminophen With Codeine
30
Cephalexin
 23
Mupirocin
 17
Doxycycline Hyclate
 16
Tramadol Hcl
 12

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

More Plastic Surgery Physician in PA → All providers in Pennsylvania → Compare specialties →

Plastic Surgery Physician Overview

How Thomas Dooley, M.D. fits within the Plastic Surgery Physician landscape nationally.

5,322
Plastic Surgery Physician Providers in US
52
States with Plastic Surgery Physician
84
Avg Claims per Provider

Thomas Dooley, M.D.'s 141 claims are above the specialty average of 84.

Nationwide Plastic Surgery Physician peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Dooley, both outside Pennsylvania so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (81.2 here).

Justin Bryant 81.2 IN Guy Crevecoeur 81.2 IN Albert Morrison 81.2 IN Mark Wells 81.3 NY

Same NPPES enumeration year (2005)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Sharon McLaughlin Weber Massapequa, NY Pravin-Kumar Patel Chicago, IL Kenneth Jones Wenatchee, WA James Ward Arlington, TX

Nearby Plastic Surgery Physician Providers in Pennsylvania

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Pennsylvania, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Dooley.

One of 201 Plastic Surgery Physician providers enrolled in Pennsylvania, 5 are shown here.

Dr. Kendra Ackerman
PA-C
Philadelphia, PA
Dr. David Adcock
M.D.
Wilkes Barre, PA
Dr. Shagun Aggarwal
M.D.
Philadelphia, PA
Dr. Nicholas Albano
M.D.
Bethlehem, PA
Dr. Oluseyi Aliu
M.D.
Pittsburgh, PA

Compare Plastic Surgery Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Thomas Dooley, M.D.'s specialty? ▼
Thomas Dooley, M.D. specializes in Plastic Surgery Physician and practices in Reading, Pennsylvania. Credentials: M.D..
How much does Thomas Dooley, M.D. prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
In 2023, Thomas Dooley, M.D. wrote 141 Medicare Part D claims totaling $2K in drug costs for 78 beneficiaries.
What is Thomas Dooley, M.D.'s Medicare quality score? ▼
Thomas Dooley, M.D. has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 81.2/100 (Quality: 74.6, Cost: 65.2). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Thomas Dooley, M.D. located? ▼
Thomas Dooley, M.D. is located at 40 KENHORST BLVD, Reading, PA, 19607. Phone: (610) 796-1000.
What is Thomas Dooley, M.D.'s NPI number? ▼
Thomas Dooley, M.D.'s National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1760464754, issued on 11/16/2005.
Does Thomas Dooley, M.D. prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs? ▼
Thomas Dooley, M.D.'s prescribing is 8% brand-name and 92% generic drugs by claim count, with $569 in brand drug costs.
Does Thomas Dooley, M.D. prescribe opioids? ▼
Yes, Thomas Dooley, M.D. had 49 opioid claims in 2023 with an opioid prescribing rate of 34.8%.
How many Plastic Surgery Physician providers are there in the US? ▼
There are 5,322 Plastic Surgery Physician providers across 52 states in the US. The average Plastic Surgery Physician provider writes 84 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Thomas Dooley, M.D. prescribe most often? ▼
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Thomas Dooley, M.D.'s most frequently prescribed drugs include Acetaminophen-Codeine, Cephalexin, Mupirocin. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Thomas Dooley, M.D. accept Medicare? ▼
Thomas Dooley, M.D. appears in CMS Medicare data with 141 Part D claims and 78 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Thomas Dooley, M.D.'s credentials? ▼
Thomas Dooley, M.D.'s NPI is 1760464754 with credentials M.D.. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.