2026 NPPES data Hospitalist Physician NPI 1629464623 DO
Verify on CMS →

Tom Jacob, DO

Hospitalist Physician in Rochester, New York.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 17,950 in Hospitalist Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
629
Medicare Part D claims · 118 beneficiaries · Hospitalist Physician avg: 940
Generic prescribing
96%
generic claims · 4% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
76.8/100
▼ 7 pts below national avg 83.5 · Above neutral

What the federal data shows

Tom Jacob, DO reported a CMS MIPS final score of 76.8/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 629 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

76.8/100
MIPS score · -7 vs avg
629
Part D claims, 2024
96%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Tom Jacob, DO

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1629464623), first enumerated 04/07/2015.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 629 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 76.8/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Board certification signal

    Heuristic suggests board-certified status based on ABMS-eligible specialty taxonomy plus active CMS participation signals — not a direct ABMS verification.

    Source: NUCC taxonomy + CMS participation heuristic

  • State context

    State board disciplinary context

    New York statewide board action statistics are published annually — these figures describe aggregate state activity, not Tom Jacob, DO's individual license status. Verify directly with the state medical board.

    Source: NYSBPMC annual report 2023

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1629464623 · Hospitalist Physician

NPI-10 · ENUM-MID · TAX-MID · MIPS-BELOW · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-LIGHT · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1629464623
  • ENUM-MID 2015
  • TAX-MID 18K Hospitalist Physician
  • MIPS-BELOW 76.8/100
  • RX-LIGHT 629
  • BOOK-LIGHT 1,316 in New York
  • PHOTO-FINISH Himad Ullah Khattak,… · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Tom Jacob, DO's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

77 ≥ 17th percentile 17% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). This entry sits in this band. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Tom Jacob, DO sits

This provider among hospitalist physician peers

Across the 4,317 hospitalist physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Tom Jacob, DO writes more Part D claims than 85% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 13% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.949.974.899.8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Tom Jacob, DO, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one hospitalist physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Tom Jacob, DO. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Tom Jacob, DO practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Tom Jacob, DO?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 04/07/2015

NPI 1629464623

Primary specialty

Hospitalist Physician

Mid-sized

17,950 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

629 33% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 940

MIPS final score

76.8/100 6.7 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in New York

How Hospitalist Physician compares to other specialties among New York providers

New York providers
Student in an Organized Heal…8%Registered Nurse5.2%Clinical Social Worker4.9%Social Worker4.5%Speech-Language Pathologist4.5%Licensed Practical Nurse4.3%Hospitalist Physician0.2%
Largest specialties in New York (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Tom Jacob, DO's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Hospitalist Physician national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
76.8/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%76.8%
MIPS final score (Hospitalist Physician) - 76.8/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

315 SCIENCE PARKWAY
Rochester, NY 14620

Provider Details

NPI 1629464623
Specialty Hospitalist Physician
Credentials DO
Gender Male
NPI Issued 04/07/2015

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

76.8466
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
68.2024
Quality
42.684
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

License & disciplinary context - New York NYSBPMC 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~100K New York medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Tom Jacob, DO. To verify Tom Jacob, DO's current license status, search the NYSBPMC public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

312
Total board actions, New York 2023
Across 302 cases
3.12
Actions per 1,000 licensees
New York statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
89 cases

NYSBPMC publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the New York disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Generic-heavy

Tom Jacob, DO - brand share 4.0%
Hospitalist Physician average

4% brand-name claims vs 96% generic, on 629 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

629
Total Claims
$25K
Total Drug Cost
118
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
746
Total Day Supply
21,227
Brand vs Generic
4% brand / 96% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$14K
Generic Drug Cost
$11K

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
73.1 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.56
Gender Split
58% female / 42% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Tom Jacob, DO prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Venlafaxine Hcl Er
Venlafaxine Hcl
67
Mirtazapine
52
Escitalopram Oxalate
44
Trazodone Hcl
44
Duloxetine Hcl
41
Risperidone
30
Bupropion Xl
Bupropion Hcl
27
Lorazepam
25
Quetiapine Fumarate
23
Clonazepam
22

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Hospitalist Physician Overview

How Tom Jacob, DO fits within the Hospitalist Physician landscape nationally.

17,950
Hospitalist Physician Providers in US
54
States with Hospitalist Physician
940
Avg Claims per Provider

Tom Jacob, DO's 629 claims are below the specialty average of 940.

Nationwide Hospitalist Physician peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Jacob, both outside New York so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (76.8 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2015)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Hospitalist Physician Providers in New York

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in New York, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Jacob.

One of 1,316 Hospitalist Physician providers enrolled in New York, 5 are shown here.

Compare Hospitalist Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Tom Jacob, DO's specialty?
Tom Jacob, DO specializes in Hospitalist Physician and practices in Rochester, New York. Credentials: DO.
How much does Tom Jacob, DO prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Tom Jacob, DO wrote 629 Medicare Part D claims totaling $25K in drug costs for 118 beneficiaries.
What is Tom Jacob, DO's Medicare quality score?
Tom Jacob, DO has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 76.8/100 (Quality: 68.2, Cost: 42.7). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Tom Jacob, DO located?
Tom Jacob, DO is located at 315 SCIENCE PARKWAY, Rochester, NY, 14620. Phone: (585) 602-1000.
What is Tom Jacob, DO's NPI number?
Tom Jacob, DO's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1629464623, issued on 04/07/2015.
Does Tom Jacob, DO prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Tom Jacob, DO's prescribing is 4% brand-name and 96% generic drugs by claim count, with $14K in brand drug costs.
How many Hospitalist Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 17,950 Hospitalist Physician providers across 54 states in the US. The average Hospitalist Physician provider writes 940 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Tom Jacob, DO prescribe most often?
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Tom Jacob, DO's most frequently prescribed drugs include Venlafaxine Hcl Er, Mirtazapine, Escitalopram Oxalate. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Tom Jacob, DO accept Medicare?
Tom Jacob, DO appears in CMS Medicare data with 629 Part D claims and 118 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Tom Jacob, DO's credentials?
Tom Jacob, DO's NPI is 1629464623 with credentials DO. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.