2026 NPPES data Registered Nurse NPI 1821683186 PMHNP
Verify on CMS →

Tonya Teasley, PMHNP

Registered Nurse in Anderson, South Carolina.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 185,440 in Registered Nurse, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
724
Medicare Part D claims · 126 beneficiaries · Registered Nurse avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
97%
generic claims · 3% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
80.1/100
▼ 3 pts below national avg 83.5 · Above neutral

What the federal data shows

Tonya Teasley, PMHNP reported a CMS MIPS final score of 80.1/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 724 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

80.1/100
MIPS score · -3 vs avg
724
Part D claims, 2024
97%
generic prescribing
≥30th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Tonya Teasley, PMHNP

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1821683186), first enumerated 03/08/2021.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 724 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 80.1/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    1 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliation on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

Compare Teasley with other Registered Nurse providers

Same primary specialty, same federal CMS NPPES roster.

All 55 Registered Nurse providers in Anderson, SC →

Also enrolled in South Carolina

Other specialties in Anderson: Mental Health Counselor (257) · Pharmacist (122) · Family Nurse Practitioner (105) · Family Medicine Physician (104)

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1821683186 · Registered Nurse

NPI-10 · ENUM-RECENT · TAX-MEGA · MIPS-BELOW · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-LIGHT · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1821683186
  • ENUM-RECENT 2021
  • TAX-MEGA 185K Registered Nurse
  • MIPS-BELOW 80.1/100
  • RX-LIGHT 724
  • BOOK-LIGHT 2,234 in South Carolina
  • PHOTO-FINISH Stephanie Quandt, FN… · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Tonya Teasley, PMHNP's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

80 ≥ 30th percentile 30% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). This entry sits in this band. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Tonya Teasley, PMHNP sits

This provider among registered nurse peers

Across the 3,271 registered nurse providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Tonya Teasley, PMHNP writes more Part D claims than 66% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 27% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 98Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 98Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Tonya Teasley, PMHNP, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 66 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one registered nurse peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Tonya Teasley, PMHNP. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Tonya Teasley, PMHNP?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 03/08/2021

NPI 1821683186

Primary specialty

Registered Nurse

High-volume

185,440 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

724 32% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,063

MIPS final score

80.1/100 3.4 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in South Carolina

How Registered Nurse compares to other specialties among South Carolina providers

South Carolina providers
Pharmacist6.1%Mental Health Counselor5%Family Nurse Practitioner4.5%Physical Therapist4.5%Behavior Technician4.2%Speech-Language Pathologist3.6%Registered Nurse2.6%
Largest specialties in South Carolina (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Tonya Teasley, PMHNP's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Registered Nurse national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
80.1/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%80.1%
MIPS final score (Registered Nurse) - 80.1/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

10 FINANCIAL BLVD
Anderson, SC 29621

Provider Details

NPI 1821683186
Specialty Registered Nurse
Credentials PMHNP
Gender Female
NPI Issued 03/08/2021

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

80.0777
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
83.4448
Quality
50.9808
Cost
99
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Tonya Teasley, PMHNP bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Taral Sharma MD PC
Anderson, SC

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Generic-heavy

Tonya Teasley, PMHNP - brand share 3.0%
Registered Nurse average

3% brand-name claims vs 97% generic, on 724 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

724
Total Claims
$34K
Total Drug Cost
126
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
728.2
Total Day Supply
7,796
Brand vs Generic
3% brand / 97% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$4K
Generic Drug Cost
$29K

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
57.8 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.62
Gender Split
48% female / 52% male
Age Distribution
<65: 82, 65-74: 42, 75-84: N/A, 85+: N/A

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Tonya Teasley, PMHNP prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Buprenorphine-Naloxone
Buprenorphine Hcl/Naloxone Hcl
526
Buprenorphine Hcl
64
Hydroxyzine Hcl
15
Mirtazapine
11
Zubsolv
Buprenorphine Hcl/Naloxone Hcl
11

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Registered Nurse Overview

How Tonya Teasley, PMHNP fits within the Registered Nurse landscape nationally.

185,440
Registered Nurse Providers in US
56
States with Registered Nurse
1,063
Avg Claims per Provider

Tonya Teasley, PMHNP's 724 claims are below the specialty average of 1,063.

Nationwide Registered Nurse peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Teasley, both outside South Carolina so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (80.1 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2021)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Registered Nurse Providers in South Carolina

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in South Carolina, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Teasley.

One of 2,234 Registered Nurse providers enrolled in South Carolina, 11 are shown on this page.

Compare Registered Nurse nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Tonya Teasley, PMHNP's specialty? ▼
Tonya Teasley, PMHNP specializes in Registered Nurse and practices in Anderson, South Carolina. Credentials: PMHNP.
How much does Tonya Teasley, PMHNP prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
In 2024, Tonya Teasley, PMHNP wrote 724 Medicare Part D claims totaling $34K in drug costs for 126 beneficiaries.
What is Tonya Teasley, PMHNP's Medicare quality score? ▼
Tonya Teasley, PMHNP has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 80.1/100 (Quality: 83.4, Cost: 51). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Tonya Teasley, PMHNP located? ▼
Tonya Teasley, PMHNP is located at 10 FINANCIAL BLVD, Anderson, SC, 29621. Phone: (864) 844-9432.
What is Tonya Teasley, PMHNP's NPI number? ▼
Tonya Teasley, PMHNP's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1821683186, issued on 03/08/2021.
Does Tonya Teasley, PMHNP prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs? ▼
Tonya Teasley, PMHNP's prescribing is 3% brand-name and 97% generic drugs by claim count, with $4K in brand drug costs.
How many Registered Nurse providers are there in the US? ▼
There are 185,440 Registered Nurse providers across 56 states in the US. The average Registered Nurse provider writes 1,063 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Tonya Teasley, PMHNP prescribe most often? ▼
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Tonya Teasley, PMHNP's most frequently prescribed drugs include Buprenorphine-Naloxone, Buprenorphine Hcl, Hydroxyzine Hcl. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Tonya Teasley, PMHNP accept Medicare? ▼
Tonya Teasley, PMHNP appears in CMS Medicare data with 724 Part D claims and 126 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Tonya Teasley, PMHNP's credentials? ▼
Tonya Teasley, PMHNP's NPI is 1821683186 with credentials PMHNP. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.