2026 NPPES data Registered Nurse NPI 1801476676
Verify on CMS →

Veronica Sarvi

Registered Nurse in Houston, Texas.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 177,204 in Registered Nurse, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
1K
Medicare Part D claims · 427 beneficiaries · Registered Nurse avg: 1K
MIPS score
82.4/100
▼ 1 pts below national avg 83.5 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$606.84
23 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)

What the federal data shows

Veronica Sarvi reported a CMS MIPS final score of 82.4/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 1,306 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

82.4/100
MIPS score · -1 vs avg
1K
Part D claims, 2023
$606.84
industry payments (Sunshine Act)
≥36th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Veronica Sarvi

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1801476676), first enumerated 04/14/2021.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 1,306 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 82.4/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    1 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliation on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • Reported

    Industry payment transparency

    $606.84 in reported industry payments (23 transfers) in 2024 under the federal Sunshine Act — disclosed transfers of value, not a quality rating.

    Source: CMS Open Payments

  • State context

    State board disciplinary context

    Texas statewide board action statistics are published annually — these figures describe aggregate state activity, not Veronica Sarvi's individual license status. Verify directly with the state medical board.

    Source: TMB annual report 2023

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1801476676 · Registered Nurse

NPI-10 · ENUM-RECENT · TAX-MEGA · MIPS-INLINE · RX-MID · BOOK-MID · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1801476676
  • ENUM-RECENT 2021
  • TAX-MEGA 177K Registered Nurse
  • MIPS-INLINE 82.4/100
  • RX-MID 1,306
  • BOOK-MID 10,675 in Texas
  • PHOTO-FINISH Jennifer Allen · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Veronica Sarvi's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

82 ≥ 36th percentile 36% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). This entry sits in this band. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Veronica Sarvi sits

This provider among registered nurse peers

Across the 3,271 registered nurse providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Veronica Sarvi writes more Part D claims than 78% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 37% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 98Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 98Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Veronica Sarvi, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one registered nurse peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Veronica Sarvi. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Veronica Sarvi?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 04/14/2021

NPI 1801476676

Primary specialty

Registered Nurse

High-volume

177,204 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

1,306 31% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,000

MIPS final score

82.4/100 1.1 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Texas

How Registered Nurse compares to other specialties among Texas providers

Texas providers
Behavior Technician5.6%Student in an Organized Heal…5.1%Family Nurse Practitioner4.5%Professional Counselor4.4%Pharmacist4.4%Speech-Language Pathologist3.9%Registered Nurse2.6%
Largest specialties in Texas (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Veronica Sarvi's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Registered Nurse national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
82.4/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%82.4%
MIPS final score (Registered Nurse) - 82.4/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

6400 FANNIN ST STE 2300
Houston, TX 77030

Provider Details

NPI 1801476676
Specialty Registered Nurse
Gender Female
NPI Issued 04/14/2021

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

82.3883
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
79.2344
Quality
58.5062
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Veronica Sarvi bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

UT Physicians
Houston, TX

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Veronica Sarvi. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$607

Largest payer

ABC Home Medical Supply, Inc.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

License & disciplinary context - Texas TMB 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~77K Texas medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Veronica Sarvi. To verify Veronica Sarvi's current license status, search the TMB public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

344
Total board actions, Texas 2023
Across 334 cases
4.47
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Texas statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
94 cases

TMB publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Texas disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

1,306
Total Claims
$743K
Total Drug Cost
427
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
2,753
Total Day Supply
77,540
Generic Drug Cost
$24K
Antibiotic Claims
199

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
71.6 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.73
Gender Split
27% female / 73% male
Age Distribution
<65: 68, 65-74: 189, 75-84: 134, 85+: 36

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Veronica Sarvi prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Tamsulosin Hcl
362
Finasteride
216
Myrbetriq
Mirabegron
189
Ciprofloxacin Hcl
71
Gemtesa
Vibegron
69
Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim
Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim
52
Alfuzosin Hcl Er
Alfuzosin Hcl
50
Estradiol
32
Nitrofurantoin Mono-Macro
Nitrofurantoin Monohyd/M-Cryst
32
Oxybutynin Chloride Er
Oxybutynin Chloride
30

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Registered Nurse Overview

How Veronica Sarvi fits within the Registered Nurse landscape nationally.

177,204
Registered Nurse Providers in US
56
States with Registered Nurse
1,000
Avg Claims per Provider

Veronica Sarvi's 1,306 claims are above the specialty average of 1,000.

Nationwide Registered Nurse peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Sarvi, both outside Texas so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (82.4 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2021)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Registered Nurse Providers in Texas

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Texas, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Sarvi.

One of 10,675 Registered Nurse providers enrolled in Texas, 5 are shown here.

Compare Registered Nurse nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Veronica Sarvi's specialty?
Veronica Sarvi specializes in Registered Nurse and practices in Houston, Texas.
How much does Veronica Sarvi prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Veronica Sarvi wrote 1,306 Medicare Part D claims totaling $743K in drug costs for 427 beneficiaries.
What is Veronica Sarvi's Medicare quality score?
Veronica Sarvi has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 82.4/100 (Quality: 79.2, Cost: 58.5). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Veronica Sarvi located?
Veronica Sarvi is located at 6400 FANNIN ST STE 2300, Houston, TX, 77030. Phone: (832) 325-7280.
What is Veronica Sarvi's NPI number?
Veronica Sarvi's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1801476676, issued on 04/14/2021.
How many Registered Nurse providers are there in the US?
There are 177,204 Registered Nurse providers across 56 states in the US. The average Registered Nurse provider writes 1,000 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Veronica Sarvi prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Veronica Sarvi's most frequently prescribed drugs include Tamsulosin Hcl, Finasteride, Myrbetriq. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Veronica Sarvi accept Medicare?
Veronica Sarvi appears in CMS Medicare data with 1,306 Part D claims and 427 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Veronica Sarvi's credentials?
Veronica Sarvi's NPI is 1801476676. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.