2026 NPPES data Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse NPI 1063177517 NP-C
Verify on CMS →

Victoria Warren, NP-C

Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 6,553 in Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
322
Medicare Part D claims · 224 beneficiaries · Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse avg: 752
Generic prescribing
78%
generic claims · 13% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
86.8/100
▲ 3 pts above national avg 83.5 · Above neutral

What the federal data shows

Victoria Warren, NP-C reported a CMS MIPS final score of 86.8/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 322 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

86.8/100
MIPS score · +3 vs avg
322
Part D claims, 2023
78%
generic prescribing
≥49th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1063177517 · Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse

NPI-10 · ENUM-RECENT · TAX-MID · MIPS-ABOVE · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1063177517
  • ENUM-RECENT 2021
  • TAX-MID 7K Critical Care
  • MIPS-ABOVE 86.8/100
  • RX-LIGHT 322
  • BOOK-THIN 116 in Indiana
  • PHOTO-FINISH Judy Tran · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Victoria Warren, NP-C's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

87 ≥ 49th percentile 49% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). This entry sits in this band. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Victoria Warren, NP-C sits

This provider among critical care medicine registered nurse peers

Across the 184 critical care medicine registered nurse providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Victoria Warren, NP-C writes more Part D claims than 58% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 52% - placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Victoria Warren, NP-C, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one critical care medicine registered nurse peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Victoria Warren, NP-C. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Victoria Warren, NP-C?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 11/01/2021

NPI 1063177517

Primary specialty

Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse

Mid-sized

6,553 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

322 57% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 752

MIPS final score

86.8/100 3.3 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Indiana

How Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse compares to other specialties among Indiana providers

Indiana providers
Behavior Technician13.6%Student in an Organized Heal…4.7%Pharmacist4.3%Family Nurse Practitioner4.2%Clinical Social Worker4.2%Mental Health Counselor4.1%Critical Care Medicine Regis…0.1%
Largest specialties in Indiana (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Victoria Warren, NP-C's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
86.8/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%86.8%
MIPS final score (Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse) - 86.8/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

3909 NEW VISION DR
Fort Wayne, IN 46845

Provider Details

NPI 1063177517
Specialty Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse
Credentials NP-C
Gender Female
NPI Issued 11/01/2021

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

86.7539
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
81.4799
Quality
89.8
Cost

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Victoria Warren, NP-C bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Parkview Health System Inc
Fort Wayne, IN
Parkview Wabash Hospital Inc
Wabash, IN

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Victoria Warren, NP-C - brand share 13.0%
Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse average

13% brand-name claims vs 78% generic, on 322 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

322
Total Claims
$9K
Total Drug Cost
224
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
324
Total Day Supply
3,104
Brand vs Generic
13% brand / 78% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$3K
Generic Drug Cost
$3K
Antibiotic Claims
131

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
71.2 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.11
Gender Split
64% female / 36% male
Age Distribution
<65: 35, 65-74: 96, 75-84: 76, 85+: 17

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Victoria Warren, NP-C prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Prednisone
62
Albuterol Sulfate Hfa
Albuterol Sulfate
36
Doxycycline Hyclate
29
Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Potass
Amoxicillin/Potassium Clav
25
Nitrofurantoin Mono-Macro
Nitrofurantoin Monohyd/M-Cryst
16
Amoxicillin
14
Lagevrio (Eua)
Molnupiravir
14
Paxlovid (Eua)
Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir
14
Cephalexin
11
Clindamycin Hcl
11

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse Overview

How Victoria Warren, NP-C fits within the Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse landscape nationally.

6,553
Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse Providers in US
53
States with Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse
752
Avg Claims per Provider

Victoria Warren, NP-C's 322 claims are below the specialty average of 752.

Nationwide Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Warren, both outside Indiana so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (86.8 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2021)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse Providers in Indiana

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Indiana, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Warren.

One of 116 Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse providers enrolled in Indiana, 5 are shown here.

Compare Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Victoria Warren, NP-C's specialty?
Victoria Warren, NP-C specializes in Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse and practices in Fort Wayne, Indiana. Credentials: NP-C.
How much does Victoria Warren, NP-C prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Victoria Warren, NP-C wrote 322 Medicare Part D claims totaling $9K in drug costs for 224 beneficiaries.
What is Victoria Warren, NP-C's Medicare quality score?
Victoria Warren, NP-C has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 86.8/100 (Quality: 81.5, Cost: 89.8). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Victoria Warren, NP-C located?
Victoria Warren, NP-C is located at 3909 NEW VISION DR, Fort Wayne, IN, 46845. Phone: (260) 469-6610.
What is Victoria Warren, NP-C's NPI number?
Victoria Warren, NP-C's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1063177517, issued on 11/01/2021.
Does Victoria Warren, NP-C prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Victoria Warren, NP-C's prescribing is 13% brand-name and 78% generic drugs by claim count, with $3K in brand drug costs.
How many Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse providers are there in the US?
There are 6,553 Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse providers across 53 states in the US. The average Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse provider writes 752 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Victoria Warren, NP-C prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Victoria Warren, NP-C's most frequently prescribed drugs include Prednisone, Albuterol Sulfate Hfa, Doxycycline Hyclate. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Victoria Warren, NP-C accept Medicare?
Victoria Warren, NP-C appears in CMS Medicare data with 322 Part D claims and 224 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Victoria Warren, NP-C's credentials?
Victoria Warren, NP-C's NPI is 1063177517 with credentials NP-C. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.