NPPES file of Aug 9, 2026

Assistive Technology Practitioner Rehabilitation Counselor in California

16 NPPES records list assistive technology practitioner rehabilitation counselor with a practice address in California, 0 per 100,000 residents, the 8th highest rate of 22. Los Angeles and Long Beach have the most; each record links to the provider's NPI and the California license search.

CMS NPPES registry, file of Aug 9, 2026; 2023 Census estimates · NUCC 225CA2400X · method

Los Angeles has the most, 3

Assistive Technology Practitioner Rehabilitation Counselor records in California

  1. Sheila ArmsteadLos Angeles, CA 900471447618285
  2. Michael BottomleyLong Beach, CA 908021881712792
  3. Shawna BryantLong Beach, CA 908021275651580
  4. Sharonda CapersSan Pedro, CA 907311083072821
  5. Albert CirinoVan Nuys, CA 914051720446560
  6. Dawnmarie GaivinOceanside, CA 920561942803648
  7. Alganesh GebrezadikTorrance, CA 905021386763555
  8. Robert GilkeyCommerce, CA 900401356469100
  9. Roger Huddlestone, MDArnold, CA 952231285490417
  10. Steve MintzLos Angeles, CA 900401124148994
  11. Paula NeimeyerUpland, CA 917861871766444
  12. Deborrah RogersLos Angeles, CA 900401255459442
  13. Susan SeguraLancaster, CA 935361821457466
  14. Anthony TreeceStockton, CA 952021285198705
  15. Ramiro VillanuevaMadera, CA 936381720201858
  16. Marcus Weight, ASSIST. TECH. PRO.San Diego, CA 921281316204274

Source: CMS NPPES, primary taxonomy 225CA2400X: records by practice city and the list of records, file of Aug 9, 2026.

California ranks 8 of 22 per resident

  1. New Hampshire0.1
  2. New Mexico0.0
  3. Kentucky0.0
  4. California0.0
  5. Washington0.0
  6. New York0.0
  7. 50 states and D.C.0.0

Source: CMS NPPES, primary taxonomy 225CA2400X by practice state, file of Aug 9, 2026; records per 100,000 residents, 2023 Census estimates.

0.0% of these records appear in a Medicare file, against 0.0% nationally

A Medicare file here is Part D prescribing (2024), a MIPS score (2023), an Open Payments record (2024) or Medicare group billing (CMS Doctors and Clinicians). A record outside them may still see patients: these files cover Medicare only.

  1. California0.0%
  2. United States0.0%

Assistive Technology Practitioner Rehabilitation Counselor records in California, measured

  • In a Medicare file0 of 16 · 0.0% here, 0.0% nationally
  • In the CMS Doctors and Clinicians file0 · 0.0% here, 0.0% nationally
  • Not updated in five years or more14 · 87.5% here, 63.7% nationally

Source: CMS NPPES, file of Aug 9, 2026 (primary taxonomy 225CA2400X); CMS Medicare Part D Prescribers 2024, MIPS 2023, Open Payments 2024 and Doctors and Clinicians, matched by NPI.

What the count covers

16 NPPES records list assistive technology practitioner rehabilitation counselor (225CA2400X) as their primary taxonomy with a practice address in California: 0 per 100,000 residents against 0 nationally (50 states and D.C.). Los Angeles has 3 of them (19%).

A record is a registration a provider made and keeps up to date: it shows neither that the provider is licensed nor that they still practice there. The state's own license search is the check.

States with a similar number

  1. Texas32

The largest states

  1. Texas32
  2. New York7
  3. Florida6
  4. Illinois3
  5. Nevada3

Source: CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), file of Aug 9, 2026 (NPPES files on CMS.gov); NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy; 2023 Census population estimates. A registry record is not a license.

Figures on PlainDoctor are read from the federal files each page names (CMS NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments; the HHS-OIG exclusion list only as counts) and from Census population estimates, with the file date shown beside them. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of Aug 9, 2026.