NPPES file of Aug 9, 2026

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiologic Technologist in California

17 NPPES records list magnetic resonance imaging radiologic technologist with a practice address in California, 0 per 100,000 residents, the 27th highest rate of 41. Laguna Woods and San Diego have the most; each record links to the provider's NPI and the California license search.

CMS NPPES registry, file of Aug 9, 2026; 2023 Census estimates · NUCC 2471M1202X · method

Written with AI tools from the named public files; every figure is computed from those files (how it is made).

Laguna Woods has the most, 3

  1. Laguna Woods3
  2. San Diego3
  3. Buena Park1
  4. Covina1
  5. El Cajon1

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiologic Technologist records in California

  1. Derrik AsherIrvine, CA 926171790918852
  2. Joshua Choi, DC, ARMRITBuena Park, CA 906201457072480
  3. Alexandria Dao, RT, MRLaguna Woods, CA 926371164091492
  4. Ronald Davis, R.T. (R) (MR) (ARRT)Pasadena, CA 911051871072975
  5. Ryan Henderson, MRI TECHNOLOGISTLaguna Woods, CA 926371003601139
  6. Meghan HoltanSan Diego, CA 921611821470352
  7. Alex LaraMoreno Valley, CA 925531558068213
  8. Michael LarsenSan Diego, CA 921281134508039
  9. Melissa MarroquinLaguna Woods, CA 926371467345686
  10. Maksim Mokrushin, R.T.(MR)(ARRT)Elk Grove, CA 957581124989017
  11. Nina Nguyen, RWestminster, CA 926831922620434
  12. Gregorio Ormeo, RT, R, MRIMartinez, CA 945531659821395
  13. Kenny Phan, CRTGarden Grove, CA 928431174104186
  14. Omar RabulanPalo Alto, CA 943051932690203
  15. Martin Reina, RT (R) (MR)Covina, CA 917231073798237
  16. Justin Souza, ARRT, CRT, R, CTSan Diego, CA 921611518373141
  17. Stephen VallelyEl Cajon, CA 920201770762783

Source: CMS NPPES, primary taxonomy 2471M1202X: records by practice city and the list of records, file of Aug 9, 2026.

California ranks 27 of 41 per resident

  1. Missouri0.0
  2. Virginia0.0
  3. Louisiana0.0
  4. California0.0
  5. Massachusetts0.0
  6. Michigan0.0
  7. 50 states and D.C.0.1

Source: CMS NPPES, primary taxonomy 2471M1202X by practice state, file of Aug 9, 2026; records per 100,000 residents, 2023 Census estimates.

0.0% of these records appear in a Medicare file, against 0.0% nationally

A Medicare file here is Part D prescribing (2024), a MIPS score (2023), an Open Payments record (2024) or Medicare group billing (CMS Doctors and Clinicians). A record outside them may still see patients: these files cover Medicare only.

  1. California0.0%
  2. United States0.0%

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiologic Technologist records in California, measured

  • In a Medicare file0 of 17 · 0.0% here, 0.0% nationally
  • In the CMS Doctors and Clinicians file0 · 0.0% here, 0.0% nationally
  • Not updated in five years or more11 · 64.7% here, 63.8% nationally

Source: CMS NPPES, file of Aug 9, 2026 (primary taxonomy 2471M1202X); CMS Medicare Part D Prescribers 2024, MIPS 2023, Open Payments 2024 and Doctors and Clinicians, matched by NPI.

What the count covers

17 NPPES records list magnetic resonance imaging radiologic technologist (2471M1202X) as their primary taxonomy with a practice address in California: 0 per 100,000 residents against 0.1 nationally (50 states and D.C.). Laguna Woods has 3 of them (18%).

A record is a registration a provider made and keeps up to date: it shows neither that the provider is licensed nor that they still practice there. The state's own license search is the check.

States with a similar number

  1. Arkansas17
  2. Georgia21
  3. Texas21
  4. Alabama10

States with a similar rate per 100,000

  1. North Carolina0.1
  2. Florida0.2

The largest states

  1. Florida39
  2. Georgia21
  3. Texas21
  4. Arkansas17
  5. Alabama10

Source: CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), file of Aug 9, 2026 (NPPES files on CMS.gov); NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy; 2023 Census population estimates. A registry record is not a license.

Figures on PlainDoctor are read from the federal files each page names (CMS NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments; the HHS-OIG exclusion list only as counts) and from Census population estimates, with the file date shown beside them. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of Aug 9, 2026.