NPPES file of Aug 9, 2026

Neonatal Intensive Care Registered Nurse in California

61 NPPES records list neonatal intensive care registered nurse with a practice address in California, 0.2 per 100,000 residents, the 15th highest rate of 44. San Diego and Loma Linda have the most; each record links to the provider's NPI and the California license search. Page 2 of 2.

CMS NPPES registry, file of Aug 9, 2026; 2023 Census estimates · NUCC 163WN0002X · method

Written with AI tools from the named public files; every figure is computed from those files (how it is made).

San Diego has the most, 5

  1. San Diego5
  2. Loma Linda3
  3. Riverside3
  4. Bakersfield2
  5. Corona2

Neonatal Intensive Care Registered Nurse records in California

  1. Donna Stump, RNHemet, CA 925441376741850
  2. Christina ThaiOakland, CA 946011376008292
  3. Angela Tito, RNIrvine, CA 926201396002523
  4. Vanessa TrujilloFullerton, CA 928321952996605
  5. Diane Vande Pol, CNSSanta Clara, CA 950511073762225
  6. Beverly Walti, RN, MSN, CPNP, CNSOrange, CA 928681609087261
  7. Maryann Wells, RNYucaipa, CA 923991114224847
  8. Lori Wilson-Hopkins, RNSan Diego, CA 921341942209952
  9. Christina Winn, RNCarlsbad, CA 920101275122632
  10. Kelley WongLoma Linda, CA 923541265943831
  11. Shu-Chuan Yang, RNC, CNS, MSN, MBASanta Clara, CA 950511063578870

Source: CMS NPPES, primary taxonomy 163WN0002X: records by practice city and the list of records, file of Aug 9, 2026.

California ranks 15 of 44 per resident

  1. Massachusetts0.2
  2. Georgia0.2
  3. Ohio0.2
  4. California0.2
  5. Vermont0.2
  6. Tennessee0.2
  7. 50 states and D.C.0.2

Source: CMS NPPES, primary taxonomy 163WN0002X by practice state, file of Aug 9, 2026; records per 100,000 residents, 2023 Census estimates.

6.6% of these records appear in a Medicare file, against 2.7% nationally

A Medicare file here is Part D prescribing (2024), a MIPS score (2023), an Open Payments record (2024) or Medicare group billing (CMS Doctors and Clinicians). A record outside them may still see patients: these files cover Medicare only.

  1. California6.6%
  2. United States2.7%

Neonatal Intensive Care Registered Nurse records in California, measured

  • In a Medicare file4 of 61 · 6.6% here, 2.7% nationally
  • In the CMS Doctors and Clinicians file0 · 0.0% here, 1.0% nationally
  • Not updated in five years or more39 · 63.9% here, 49.2% nationally

Source: CMS NPPES, file of Aug 9, 2026 (primary taxonomy 163WN0002X); CMS Medicare Part D Prescribers 2024, MIPS 2023, Open Payments 2024 and Doctors and Clinicians, matched by NPI.

What the count covers

61 NPPES records list neonatal intensive care registered nurse (163WN0002X) as their primary taxonomy with a practice address in California: 0.2 per 100,000 residents against 0.2 nationally (50 states and D.C.). San Diego has 5 of them (8%).

A record is a registration a provider made and keeps up to date: it shows neither that the provider is licensed nor that they still practice there. The state's own license search is the check.

States with a similar number

  1. New York66
  2. Texas33
  3. Florida26
  4. Colorado24

States with a similar rate per 100,000

  1. Tennessee0.2
  2. Michigan0.1
  3. Illinois0.1
  4. Ohio0.2

The largest states

  1. New York66
  2. Texas33
  3. Florida26
  4. Colorado24
  5. Georgia23

Source: CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), file of Aug 9, 2026 (NPPES files on CMS.gov); NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy; 2023 Census population estimates. A registry record is not a license.

Figures on PlainDoctor are read from the federal files each page names (CMS NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments; the HHS-OIG exclusion list only as counts) and from Census population estimates, with the file date shown beside them. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of Aug 9, 2026.