NPPES file of Aug 9, 2026

Pathology Specialist/Technologist in Maryland

11 NPPES records list pathology specialist/technologist with a practice address in Maryland, 0.2 per 100,000 residents, the 5th highest rate of 39. Cumberland and Silver Spring have the most; each record links to the provider's NPI and the Maryland license search.

CMS NPPES registry, file of Aug 9, 2026; 2023 Census estimates · NUCC 246Q00000X · method

Written with AI tools from the named public files; every figure is computed from those files (how it is made).

Cumberland has the most, 5

  1. Cumberland5
  2. Silver Spring2
  3. Rockville1
  4. Severn1
  5. Severna Park1

Pathology Specialist/Technologist records in Maryland

  1. David Dusenbery, M.D.Cumberland, MD 215021902917131
  2. Tishay EldridgeSevern, MD 211441174403760
  3. Kenneth Friedman, M.D.Silver Spring, MD 209031083613459
  4. Lindsay Lavin, M.S.,CCC-SLPSeverna Park, MD 211461760078992
  5. Samuel LewisRockville, MD 208521699628875
  6. Barbara McAlpine, M.D.Silver Spring, MD 209031366405201
  7. Katrina ProctorWhite Plains, MD 206951942167473
  8. Francisco Reyes, M.D.Cumberland, MD 215021558472787
  9. Elmer Thompson, M.D.Cumberland, MD 215021376654590
  10. Jonathan Walburn, M.D.Cumberland, MD 215021184735318
  11. Naimin Wei, M.D.Cumberland, MD 215021578674792

Source: CMS NPPES, primary taxonomy 246Q00000X: records by practice city and the list of records, file of Aug 9, 2026.

Maryland ranks 5 of 39 per resident

  1. Georgia0.3
  2. South Dakota0.2
  3. Rhode Island0.2
  4. Maryland0.2
  5. Utah0.2
  6. Arizona0.2
  7. 50 states and D.C.0.1

Source: CMS NPPES, primary taxonomy 246Q00000X by practice state, file of Aug 9, 2026; records per 100,000 residents, 2023 Census estimates.

36.4% of these records appear in a Medicare file, against 4.2% nationally

A Medicare file here is Part D prescribing (2024), a MIPS score (2023), an Open Payments record (2024) or Medicare group billing (CMS Doctors and Clinicians). A record outside them may still see patients: these files cover Medicare only.

  1. Maryland36.4%
  2. United States4.2%

Pathology Specialist/Technologist records in Maryland, measured

  • In a Medicare file4 of 11 · 36.4% here, 4.2% nationally
  • In the CMS Doctors and Clinicians file4 · 36.4% here, 4.2% nationally
  • Not updated in five years or more6 · 54.5% here, 40.8% nationally

Source: CMS NPPES, file of Aug 9, 2026 (primary taxonomy 246Q00000X); CMS Medicare Part D Prescribers 2024, MIPS 2023, Open Payments 2024 and Doctors and Clinicians, matched by NPI.

What the count covers

11 NPPES records list pathology specialist/technologist (246Q00000X) as their primary taxonomy with a practice address in Maryland: 0.2 per 100,000 residents against 0.1 nationally (50 states and D.C.). Cumberland has 5 of them (45%).

A record is a registration a provider made and keeps up to date: it shows neither that the provider is licensed nor that they still practice there. The state's own license search is the check.

States with a similar number

  1. Arizona12
  2. Ohio10
  3. Pennsylvania13
  4. Virginia13

States with a similar rate per 100,000

  1. New York0.1
  2. Texas0.1
  3. Florida0.1
  4. Georgia0.3

The largest states

  1. Georgia31
  2. Texas28
  3. New York25
  4. California24
  5. Florida20

Source: CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), file of Aug 9, 2026 (NPPES files on CMS.gov); NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy; 2023 Census population estimates. A registry record is not a license.

Figures on PlainDoctor are read from the federal files each page names (CMS NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments; the HHS-OIG exclusion list only as counts) and from Census population estimates, with the file date shown beside them. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of Aug 9, 2026.