NPPES file of Aug 9, 2026

Rehabilitation Practitioner in California

13,765 NPPES records list rehabilitation practitioner with a practice address in California, 35.3 per 100,000 residents, the 2nd highest rate of 51. Los Angeles and Pasadena have the most; each record links to the provider's NPI and the California license search. Page 71 of 276.

CMS NPPES registry, file of Aug 9, 2026; 2023 Census estimates · NUCC 225400000X · method

Written with AI tools from the named public files; every figure is computed from those files (how it is made).

Los Angeles has the most, 1,587

  1. Los Angeles1,587
  2. Pasadena924
  3. San Jose701
  4. San Diego596
  5. Commerce577

Rehabilitation Practitioner records in California

  1. Lisseth EsperanzaFountain Valley, CA 927081700731825
  2. Amy EspinoMerced, CA 953411669839718
  3. Emily Espino HernandezSan Jose, CA 951121679343966
  4. Citlalic EspinosaNorthridge, CA 913251194266635
  5. Lindsey EspinosaMerced, CA 953411659083004
  6. Martha EspinosaLos Angeles, CA 900071154574655
  7. Olivia Espinosa, BSVan Nuys, CA 914111457780223
  8. Aaron EspinozaSan Diego, CA 921051194670539
  9. Aurora EspinozaSan Diego, CA 921011326868340
  10. Cecilia EspinozaLaguna Hills, CA 926531073175246
  11. Edgar EspinozaTustin, CA 927801316737653
  12. Felix EspinozaCommerce, CA 900401528504537
  13. Fernando EspinozaCommerce, CA 900401285284737
  14. Gerardo EspinozaRancho Cucamonga, CA 917301518409754
  15. Jamie EspinozaLos Angeles, CA 900421023660495
  16. Jennifer EspinozaPasadena, CA 911051841923679
  17. Jessica EspinozaOakland, CA 946021730524687
  18. Lori EspinozaIndio, CA 922011457244428
  19. Macey EspinozaElk Grove, CA 957581649826520
  20. Maria EspinozaLancaster, CA 935351598007304
  21. Michael Espinoza, TBSSanta Fe Springs, CA 906701790262111
  22. Olivia EspinozaCommerce, CA 900401467627240
  23. Ricardo EspinozaSan Jose, CA 951311083152706
  24. Rosa EspinozaRiverside, CA 925071447141031
  25. Sergio EspinozaLos Angeles, CA 900231972847952
  26. Stephanie Espinoza, BASanta Ana, CA 927011376904219
  27. Tanya EspinozaSanta Clara, CA 950511225802648
  28. Veronica EspinozaApple Valley, CA 923071821863853
  29. Viviana EspinozaEl Monte, CA 917311780097584
  30. Yesenia EspinozaCosta Mesa, CA 926261225691009
  31. Zandra EspinozaCommerce, CA 900401871040881
  32. Zurich EspinozaLos Angeles, CA 900421710787304
  33. Claudia Espinoza PadillaSan Jose, CA 951121568027985
  34. Liliebeth Espiritu-RajSan Francisco, CA 941221235453911
  35. Adrian EsquedaRiverside, CA 925071083557714
  36. Jennifer EsquedaColton, CA 923241093554792
  37. Natalia EsquedaReseda, CA 913351962387357
  38. Ryann EsquedaPasadena, CA 911031730356502
  39. Juan EsquibelIrwindale, CA 917061497083414
  40. Angela EsquivelSan Jose, CA 951121821923194
  41. Odalys EsquivelNorthridge, CA 913251669018172
  42. Yolanda EsquivelSanta Ana, CA 927051902672884
  43. Monica Esquivel GarciaSalinas, CA 939061447976386
  44. Karina Esquivel GilSan Diego, CA 921031922971605
  45. Anna EsquivezCovina, CA 917241003229808
  46. Alexis Esrick, BSSan Francisco, CA 941031396522587
  47. Hilda EstebanPasadena, CA 911031265155261
  48. Eric EstepSan Diego, CA 921011235598442
  49. Charles EstesSanta Cruz, CA 950601457557084
  50. Mary Madison EstesSan Luis Obispo, CA 934011750127973

Source: CMS NPPES, primary taxonomy 225400000X: records by practice city and the list of records, file of Aug 9, 2026.

California ranks 2 of 51 per resident

  1. Nevada167.6
  2. California35.3
  3. Minnesota3.8
  4. Michigan3.1
  5. 50 states and D.C.6.2

Source: CMS NPPES, primary taxonomy 225400000X by practice state, file of Aug 9, 2026; records per 100,000 residents, 2023 Census estimates.

0.1% of these records appear in a Medicare file, against 0.4% nationally

A Medicare file here is Part D prescribing (2024), a MIPS score (2023), an Open Payments record (2024) or Medicare group billing (CMS Doctors and Clinicians). A record outside them may still see patients: these files cover Medicare only.

  1. California0.1%
  2. United States0.4%

Rehabilitation Practitioner records in California, measured

  • In a Medicare file13 of 13,765 · 0.1% here, 0.4% nationally
  • In the CMS Doctors and Clinicians file13 · 0.1% here, 0.3% nationally
  • Not updated in five years or more6,009 · 43.7% here, 58.2% nationally
  • Median graduation year2008 · the 13 records with a school on file

Source: CMS NPPES, file of Aug 9, 2026 (primary taxonomy 225400000X); CMS Medicare Part D Prescribers 2024, MIPS 2023, Open Payments 2024 and Doctors and Clinicians, matched by NPI.

What the count covers

13,765 NPPES records list rehabilitation practitioner (225400000X) as their primary taxonomy with a practice address in California: 35.3 per 100,000 residents against 6.2 nationally (50 states and D.C.). Los Angeles has 1,587 of them (12%).

A record is a registration a provider made and keeps up to date: it shows neither that the provider is licensed nor that they still practice there. The state's own license search is the check.

States with a similar number

  1. Nevada5,354
  2. Michigan314
  3. Minnesota218
  4. Illinois154

States with a similar rate per 100,000

  1. Delaware1.7
  2. District of Columbia1.6
  3. Wisconsin1.5
  4. New Mexico1.2

The largest states

  1. Nevada5,354
  2. Michigan314
  3. Minnesota218
  4. Illinois154
  5. New York100

Source: CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), file of Aug 9, 2026 (NPPES files on CMS.gov); NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy; 2023 Census population estimates. A registry record is not a license.

Figures on PlainDoctor are read from the federal files each page names (CMS NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments; the HHS-OIG exclusion list only as counts) and from Census population estimates, with the file date shown beside them. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of Aug 9, 2026.