2026 NPPES data Athletic Trainer NPI 1316223589 PA-C, ATC
Verify on CMS →

Drew Schaafsma, PA-C, ATC

Athletic Trainer in Naperville, Illinois.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 49,062 in Athletic Trainer, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
34
Medicare Part D claims · 28 beneficiaries · Athletic Trainer avg: 465
MIPS score
72.7/100
▼ 11 pts below national avg 83.5 · Mid-tier

What the federal data shows

Drew Schaafsma, PA-C, ATC reported a CMS MIPS final score of 72.7/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 34 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

72.7/100
MIPS score · -11 vs avg
34
Part D claims, 2024
≥10th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Drew Schaafsma, PA-C, ATC

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1316223589), first enumerated 11/01/2011.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 34 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 72.7/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    1 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliation on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • State context

    State board disciplinary context

    Illinois statewide board action statistics are published annually — these figures describe aggregate state activity, not Drew Schaafsma, PA-C, ATC's individual license status. Verify directly with the state medical board.

    Source: IDFPR annual report 2023

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1316223589 · Athletic Trainer

NPI-10 · ENUM-MID · TAX-MID · MIPS-LOW · RX-TRACE · BOOK-LIGHT · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1316223589
  • ENUM-MID 2011
  • TAX-MID 49K Athletic Trainer
  • MIPS-LOW 72.7/100
  • RX-TRACE 34
  • BOOK-LIGHT 2,119 in Illinois
  • PHOTO-FINISH Kelcey Cooper, PA-C,… · ±0.6

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Drew Schaafsma, PA-C, ATC's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

73 ≥ 10th percentile 10% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). This entry sits in this band. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Drew Schaafsma, PA-C, ATC sits

This provider among athletic trainer peers

Across the 157 athletic trainer providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Drew Schaafsma, PA-C, ATC writes more Part D claims than 4% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 8% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Drew Schaafsma, PA-C, ATC, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 4 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one athletic trainer peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Drew Schaafsma, PA-C, ATC. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Drew Schaafsma, PA-C, ATC?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 11/01/2011

NPI 1316223589

Primary specialty

Athletic Trainer

Mid-sized

49,062 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

34 93% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 465

MIPS final score

72.7/100 10.8 pts vs avg

Mid-tier band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Illinois

How Athletic Trainer compares to other specialties among Illinois providers

Illinois providers
Clinical Social Worker5.2%Physical Therapist4.9%Mental Health Counselor4.5%Speech-Language Pathologist4.2%Student in an Organized Heal…4.1%Pharmacist4.1%Athletic Trainer0.9%
Largest specialties in Illinois (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Drew Schaafsma, PA-C, ATC's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Athletic Trainer national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
72.7/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%72.7%
MIPS final score (Athletic Trainer) - 72.7/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

2940 ROLLINGRIDGE RD STE 102
Naperville, IL 60564

Provider Details

NPI 1316223589
Specialty Athletic Trainer
Credentials PA-C, ATC
Gender Male
NPI Issued 11/01/2011

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

72.6842
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
71.8158
Quality
52.965
Cost
81
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Drew Schaafsma, PA-C, ATC bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Illinois Bone And Joint Institute, LLC
New Lenox, IL

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

License & disciplinary context - Illinois IDFPR 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~42K Illinois medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Drew Schaafsma, PA-C, ATC. To verify Drew Schaafsma, PA-C, ATC's current license status, search the IDFPR public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

106
Total board actions, Illinois 2023
Across 103 cases
2.52
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Illinois statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
38 cases

IDFPR publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Illinois disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

34
Total Claims
$260
Total Drug Cost
28
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
34
Total Day Supply
343
Brand Drug Cost
$0
Generic Drug Cost
$260
Opioid Claims
19 (55.9% rate)

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
69.3 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.07
Gender Split
57% female / 43% male

Athletic Trainer Overview

How Drew Schaafsma, PA-C, ATC fits within the Athletic Trainer landscape nationally.

49,062
Athletic Trainer Providers in US
54
States with Athletic Trainer
465
Avg Claims per Provider

Drew Schaafsma, PA-C, ATC's 34 claims are below the specialty average of 465.

Nationwide Athletic Trainer peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Schaafsma, both outside Illinois so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (72.7 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2011)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Athletic Trainer Providers in Illinois

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Illinois, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Schaafsma.

One of 2,119 Athletic Trainer providers enrolled in Illinois, 5 are shown here.

Compare Athletic Trainer nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Drew Schaafsma, PA-C, ATC's specialty?
Drew Schaafsma, PA-C, ATC specializes in Athletic Trainer and practices in Naperville, Illinois. Credentials: PA-C, ATC.
How much does Drew Schaafsma, PA-C, ATC prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Drew Schaafsma, PA-C, ATC wrote 34 Medicare Part D claims totaling $260 in drug costs for 28 beneficiaries.
What is Drew Schaafsma, PA-C, ATC's Medicare quality score?
Drew Schaafsma, PA-C, ATC has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 72.7/100 (Quality: 71.8, Cost: 53). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Drew Schaafsma, PA-C, ATC located?
Drew Schaafsma, PA-C, ATC is located at 2940 ROLLINGRIDGE RD STE 102, Naperville, IL, 60564. Phone: (630) 579-6500.
What is Drew Schaafsma, PA-C, ATC's NPI number?
Drew Schaafsma, PA-C, ATC's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1316223589, issued on 11/01/2011.
Does Drew Schaafsma, PA-C, ATC prescribe opioids?
Yes, Drew Schaafsma, PA-C, ATC had 19 opioid claims in 2024 with an opioid prescribing rate of 55.9%.
How many Athletic Trainer providers are there in the US?
There are 49,062 Athletic Trainer providers across 54 states in the US. The average Athletic Trainer provider writes 465 Medicare Part D claims per year.
Does Drew Schaafsma, PA-C, ATC accept Medicare?
Drew Schaafsma, PA-C, ATC appears in CMS Medicare data with 34 Part D claims and 28 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Drew Schaafsma, PA-C, ATC's credentials?
Drew Schaafsma, PA-C, ATC's NPI is 1316223589 with credentials PA-C, ATC. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.