2026 NPPES data Midwife NPI 1144653247 CNM
Verify on CMS →

Katy Warzecha, CNM

Midwife in Post Falls, Idaho.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 6,057 in Midwife, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
61
Medicare Part D claims · 25 beneficiaries · Midwife avg: 112
Generic prescribing
77%
generic claims · 23% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
94.9/100
▲ 11 pts above national avg 83.5 · Exceptional

What the federal data shows

Katy Warzecha, CNM reported a CMS MIPS final score of 94.9/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 61 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

94.9/100
MIPS score · +11 vs avg
61
Part D claims, 2024
77%
generic prescribing
≥73rd
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Katy Warzecha, CNM

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1144653247), first enumerated 08/13/2013.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 61 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 94.9/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    1 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliation on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1144653247 · Midwife

NPI-10 · ENUM-MID · TAX-MID · MIPS-ELITE · RX-TRACE · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1144653247
  • ENUM-MID 2013
  • TAX-MID 6K Midwife
  • MIPS-ELITE 94.9/100
  • RX-TRACE 61
  • BOOK-THIN 126 in Idaho
  • PHOTO-FINISH Khadra Abdi, CNM · ±0.3

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Katy Warzecha, CNM's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

95 ≥ 73rd percentile 73% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Katy Warzecha, CNM sits

This provider among midwife peers

Across the 101 midwife providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Katy Warzecha, CNM writes more Part D claims than 68% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 76% - placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Katy Warzecha, CNM, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 76
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one midwife peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Katy Warzecha, CNM. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Katy Warzecha, CNM?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 08/13/2013

NPI 1144653247

Primary specialty

Midwife

Mid-sized

6,057 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

61 46% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 112

MIPS final score

94.9/100 11.4 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Idaho

How Midwife compares to other specialties among Idaho providers

Idaho providers
Pharmacist5.3%Physical Therapist5.2%Mental Health Counselor5.1%Social Worker5%Clinical Social Worker4.5%Family Medicine Physician3.8%Midwife0.4%
Largest specialties in Idaho (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Katy Warzecha, CNM's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Midwife national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
94.9/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%94.9%
MIPS final score (Midwife) - 94.9/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

1300 E MULLAN AVE STE 500
Post Falls, ID 83854

Provider Details

NPI 1144653247
Specialty Midwife
Credentials CNM
Gender Female
NPI Issued 08/13/2013

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

94.9134
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
87.8394
Quality
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Alternative Payment Model

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Katy Warzecha, CNM bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Kootenai Health Inc
Post Falls, ID

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Katy Warzecha, CNM - brand share 23.0%
Midwife average

23% brand-name claims vs 77% generic, on 61 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

61
Total Claims
$6K
Total Drug Cost
25
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
143.767
Total Day Supply
4,104
Brand vs Generic
23% brand / 77% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$3K
Generic Drug Cost
$3K

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
57.5 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
0.79
Gender Split
100% female / 0% male
Age Distribution
<65: 14, 65-74: N/A, 75-84: N/A, 85+: 0

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

Drug Claims
Estradiol
24

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Midwife Overview

How Katy Warzecha, CNM fits within the Midwife landscape nationally.

6,057
Midwife Providers in US
54
States with Midwife
112
Avg Claims per Provider

Katy Warzecha, CNM's 61 claims are below the specialty average of 112.

Nationwide Midwife peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Warzecha, both outside Idaho so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (94.9 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2013)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Midwife Providers in Idaho

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Idaho, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Warzecha.

One of 126 Midwife providers enrolled in Idaho, 5 are shown here.

Compare Midwife nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Katy Warzecha, CNM's specialty?
Katy Warzecha, CNM specializes in Midwife and practices in Post Falls, Idaho. Credentials: CNM.
How much does Katy Warzecha, CNM prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Katy Warzecha, CNM wrote 61 Medicare Part D claims totaling $6K in drug costs for 25 beneficiaries.
What is Katy Warzecha, CNM's Medicare quality score?
Katy Warzecha, CNM has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 94.9/100 (Quality: 87.8). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Katy Warzecha, CNM located?
Katy Warzecha, CNM is located at 1300 E MULLAN AVE STE 500, Post Falls, ID, 83854. Phone: (208) 625-5635.
What is Katy Warzecha, CNM's NPI number?
Katy Warzecha, CNM's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1144653247, issued on 08/13/2013.
Does Katy Warzecha, CNM prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Katy Warzecha, CNM's prescribing is 23% brand-name and 77% generic drugs by claim count, with $3K in brand drug costs.
How many Midwife providers are there in the US?
There are 6,057 Midwife providers across 54 states in the US. The average Midwife provider writes 112 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Katy Warzecha, CNM prescribe most often?
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Katy Warzecha, CNM's most frequently prescribed drugs include Estradiol. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Katy Warzecha, CNM accept Medicare?
Katy Warzecha, CNM appears in CMS Medicare data with 61 Part D claims and 25 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Katy Warzecha, CNM's credentials?
Katy Warzecha, CNM's NPI is 1144653247 with credentials CNM. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.