2026 NPPES data Clinical Nurse Specialist NPI 1730713546 APN
Verify on CMS →

Kim Scott, APN

Clinical Nurse Specialist in Peoria, Illinois.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 1,715 in Clinical Nurse Specialist, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
47
Medicare Part D claims · 26 beneficiaries · Clinical Nurse Specialist avg: 953
MIPS score
72.9/100
▼ 10 pts below national avg 83.1 · Mid-tier
Industry payments
$769.83
8 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Kim Scott, APN reported a CMS MIPS final score of 72.9/100 - below the 83.1 national average - and filed 47 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

72.9/100
MIPS score · -10 vs avg
47
Part D claims, 2023
$769.83
industry payments (Sunshine Act)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Kim Scott, APN's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure

73 10th percentile higher than 10% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). This entry sits in this band. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Kim Scott, APN sits

This provider among clinical nurse specialist peers

Across the 134 clinical nurse specialist providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Kim Scott, APN writes more Part D claims than 16% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 13% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.448.873.297.7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePart D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Kim Scott, APN-Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 16 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one clinical nurse specialist peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Kim Scott, APN. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Kim Scott, APN?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 03/02/2020

NPI 1730713546

Primary specialty

Clinical Nurse Specialist

Niche

1,715 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

47 95% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 953

MIPS final score

72.9/100 10.2 pts vs avg

Mid-tier band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Illinois

How Clinical Nurse Specialist compares to other specialties among Illinois providers

Illinois providers
Clinical Social Worker - 5.2%Clinical Social Worker5.2%Physical Therapist - 5%Physical Therapist5%Mental Health Counselor - 4.5%Mental Health Counselor4.5%Speech-Language Pathologist - 4.2%Speech-Language Pathologist4.2%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program - 4.2%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program4.2%Pharmacist - 4.1%Pharmacist4.1%Clinical Nurse Specialist - 0.1%Clinical Nurse Specialist0.1%
Largest specialties in Illinois (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Kim Scott, APN's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Clinical Nurse Specialist national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
72.9/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Clinical Nurse Specialist) - 72.9/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%72.9%
MIPS final score (Clinical Nurse Specialist) - 72.9/100 vs national avg 83.1
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Kim Scott, APN appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Clinical Nurse Specialist provider holding APN credentials at 8940 N WOOD SAGE RD, Peoria, IL, 61615, with a listed phone of (309) 243-3000. NPI 1730713546 was issued on 03/02/2020.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 47 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 26 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $3K in drug spend. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 72.9/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 64, Cost 48.9), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Clinical Nurse Specialist is a narrow specialty nationwide, with 1,715 enrolled providers across 49 states and an average of 953 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline.

Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

8940 N WOOD SAGE RD
Peoria, IL 61615

Provider Details

NPI 1730713546
Specialty Clinical Nurse Specialist
Credentials APN
Gender Female
NPI Issued 03/02/2020

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

72.9328
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
63.962
Quality
48.9367
Cost
86
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Kim Scott, APN bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Oncology-Hematology Associates OF Central Illinois P C
Macomb, IL

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Kim Scott, APN. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$770

Largest payer

AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

License & disciplinary context - Illinois IDFPR 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~42K Illinois medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Kim Scott, APN. To verify Kim Scott, APN's current license status, search the IDFPR public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

106
Total board actions, Illinois 2023
Across 103 cases
2.52
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Illinois statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
38 cases

IDFPR publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Illinois disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

47
Total Claims
$3K
Total Drug Cost
26
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
69
Total Day Supply
1,510
Generic Drug Cost
$3K

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
72.5 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
2.44

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

Drug Claims
Anastrozole
11

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Clinical Nurse Specialist Overview

How Kim Scott, APN fits within the Clinical Nurse Specialist landscape nationally.

1,715
Clinical Nurse Specialist Providers in US
49
States with Clinical Nurse Specialist
953
Avg Claims per Provider

Kim Scott, APN's 47 claims are below the specialty average of 953.

Nearby Clinical Nurse Specialist Providers in Illinois

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Illinois, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Scott.

Compare Clinical Nurse Specialist nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Illinois medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Clinical Nurse Specialist peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Kim Scott, APN's specialty?
Kim Scott, APN specializes in Clinical Nurse Specialist and practices in Peoria, Illinois. Credentials: APN.
How much does Kim Scott, APN prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Kim Scott, APN wrote 47 Medicare Part D claims totaling $3K in drug costs for 26 beneficiaries.
What is Kim Scott, APN's Medicare quality score?
Kim Scott, APN has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 72.9/100 (Quality: 64, Cost: 48.9). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Kim Scott, APN located?
Kim Scott, APN is located at 8940 N WOOD SAGE RD, Peoria, IL, 61615. Phone: (309) 243-3000.
What is Kim Scott, APN's NPI number?
Kim Scott, APN's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1730713546, issued on 03/02/2020.
How many Clinical Nurse Specialist providers are there in the US?
There are 1,715 Clinical Nurse Specialist providers across 49 states in the US. The average Clinical Nurse Specialist provider writes 953 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Kim Scott, APN prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Kim Scott, APN's most frequently prescribed drugs include Anastrozole. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Kim Scott, APN accept Medicare?
Kim Scott, APN appears in CMS Medicare data with 47 Part D claims and 26 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Kim Scott, APN's credentials?
Kim Scott, APN's NPI is 1730713546 with credentials APN. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.