2026 NPPES data Family Nurse Practitioner NPI 1508312034 FNP
Verify on CMS →

Marek Piszczatowski, FNP

Family Nurse Practitioner in Chicago, Illinois. This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers — including 209,817 in Family Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration — see our methodology.

Federal data — no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is — no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
1K
Medicare Part D claims · 52 beneficiaries · Family Nurse Practitioner avg: 1K
MIPS score
84.6/100
▲ 1 pts above national avg 83.1 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$871.65
14 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Marek Piszczatowski, FNP reported a CMS MIPS final score of 84.6/100 — above the 83.1 national average — and filed 1,006 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

84.6/100
MIPS score · +1 vs avg
1K
Part D claims, 2023
$871.65
industry payments (Sunshine Act)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) — no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Marek Piszczatowski, FNP's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023 — the federal quality measure

85 45th percentile higher than 45% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). This entry sits in this band. 90–100: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Marek Piszczatowski, FNP sits

This provider among family nurse practitioner peers

Across the 27,154 family nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Marek Piszczatowski, FNP writes more Part D claims than 68% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 44% — placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100022.344.666.989.3Part D claim volume — percentile in specialtyMIPS quality — percentilePart D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality — percentile: 35Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality — percentile: 8Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality — percentile: 55Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality — percentile: 12Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality — percentile: 72Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality — percentile: 68Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality — percentile: 78Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality — percentile: 5Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality — percentile: 0Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality — percentile: 75Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality — percentile: 7Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality — percentile: 20Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality — percentile: 3Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality — percentile: 23Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality — percentile: 65Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality — percentile: 73Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality — percentile: 42Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality — percentile: 22Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality — percentile: 83Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality — percentile: 10Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality — percentile: 37Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality — percentile: 48Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality — percentile: 62Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality — percentile: 60Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality — percentile: 38Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality — percentile: 30Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality — percentile: 27Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality — percentile: 70Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality — percentile: 82Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality — percentile: 58Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality — percentile: 53Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality — percentile: 75Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality — percentile: 50Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality — percentile: 28Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 18Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality — percentile: 52Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality — percentile: 80Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality — percentile: 67Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality — percentile: 25Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality — percentile: 63Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality — percentile: 2Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality — percentile: 57Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality — percentile: 33Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality — percentile: 47Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality — percentile: 40Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality — percentile: 42Marek Piszczatowski, FNP — Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality — percentile: 44
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one family nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Marek Piszczatowski, FNP. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Marek Piszczatowski, FNP?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 08/25/2016

NPI 1508312034

Primary specialty

Family Nurse Practitioner

High-volume

209,817 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

1,006 18% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,222

MIPS final score

84.6/100 1.5 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Illinois

How Family Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among Illinois providers

Illinois providers

Largest specialties in Illinois (% of in-state providers)

Clinical Social Worker — 5.2%Clinical Social Worker5.2%Physical Therapist — 5%Physical Therapist5%Mental Health Counselor — 4.5%Mental Health Counselor4.5%Speech-Language Pathologist — 4.2%Speech-Language Pathologist4.2%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program — 4.2%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program4.2%Pharmacist — 4.1%Pharmacist4.1%Family Nurse Practitioner — 3%Family Nurse Practitioner3%
Largest specialties in Illinois (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance — MIPS

Marek Piszczatowski, FNP's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Family Nurse Practitioner national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
84.6/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Family Nurse Practitioner) — 84.6/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%84.6%
MIPS final score (Family Nurse Practitioner) — 84.6/100 vs national avg 83.1

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Marek Piszczatowski, FNP appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Family Nurse Practitioner provider holding FNP credentials at 1901 W HARRISON ST, Chicago, IL, 60612, with a listed phone of (312) 864-6000. NPI 1508312034 was issued on 08/25/2016. Because NPPES data is self-reported by the provider and refreshed monthly, the address, phone, and specialty reflect what Piszczatowski most recently submitted to CMS rather than a vetted directory listing, which is why patients should always confirm the practice is still at this location before scheduling.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 1,006 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 52 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $1.3 million in drug spend. These figures capture only Medicare Part D — commercial insurance, Medicaid, and cash-pay prescriptions are not included, and any drug-beneficiary cell under 11 is suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 84.6/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 60.3, Cost 67), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Family Nurse Practitioner is a high-volume specialty nationwide, with 209,817 enrolled providers across 56 states and an average of 1,222 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist — always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

1901 W HARRISON ST
Chicago, IL 60612

Provider Details

NPI 1508312034
Specialty Family Nurse Practitioner
Credentials FNP
Gender Male
NPI Issued 08/25/2016

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

84.5729
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
60.2504
Quality
67.0015
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Marek Piszczatowski, FNP bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" — a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Cook County
Chicago, IL

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) — CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Marek Piszczatowski, FNP. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$872

Largest payer

ViiV Healthcare Company

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias — they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

License & disciplinary context — Illinois IDFPR 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only — NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~42K Illinois medical licensees in 2023 — they are NOT specific to Marek Piszczatowski, FNP. To verify Marek Piszczatowski, FNP's current license status, search the IDFPR public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

106
Total board actions, Illinois 2023
Across 103 cases
2.52
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Illinois statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
38 cases

IDFPR publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Illinois disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

1,006
Total Claims
$1.3M
Total Drug Cost
52
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
1,133
Total Day Supply
33,120
Generic Drug Cost
$17K

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
57.4 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.38
Age Distribution
<65: 34, 65-74: 18, 75-84: 0, 85+: 0

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Marek Piszczatowski, FNP prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Biktarvy
Bictegrav/Emtricit/Tenofov Ala
202
Atorvastatin Calcium
85
Hydrochlorothiazide
55
Albuterol Sulfate Hfa
Albuterol Sulfate
43
Amlodipine Besylate
35
Gabapentin
25
Tamsulosin Hcl
23
Genvoya
Elviteg/Cob/Emtri/Tenof Alafen
21
Prezista
Darunavir
21
Nifedipine Er
Nifedipine
20

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Family Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Marek Piszczatowski, FNP fits within the Family Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

209,817
Family Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
56
States with Family Nurse Practitioner
1,222
Avg Claims per Provider

Marek Piszczatowski, FNP's 1,006 claims are below the specialty average of 1,222.

Nearby Family Nurse Practitioner Providers in Illinois

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Illinois, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Piszczatowski.

Compare Family Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry — providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Illinois medical board — federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Family Nurse Practitioner peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only — they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Marek Piszczatowski, FNP's specialty?
Marek Piszczatowski, FNP specializes in Family Nurse Practitioner and practices in Chicago, Illinois. Credentials: FNP.
How much does Marek Piszczatowski, FNP prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Marek Piszczatowski, FNP wrote 1,006 Medicare Part D claims totaling $1.3M in drug costs for 52 beneficiaries.
What is Marek Piszczatowski, FNP's Medicare quality score?
Marek Piszczatowski, FNP has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 84.6/100 (Quality: 60.3, Cost: 67). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Marek Piszczatowski, FNP located?
Marek Piszczatowski, FNP is located at 1901 W HARRISON ST, Chicago, IL, 60612. Phone: (312) 864-6000.
What is Marek Piszczatowski, FNP's NPI number?
Marek Piszczatowski, FNP's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1508312034, issued on 08/25/2016.
How many Family Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US?
There are 209,817 Family Nurse Practitioner providers across 56 states in the US. The average Family Nurse Practitioner provider writes 1,222 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Marek Piszczatowski, FNP prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Marek Piszczatowski, FNP's most frequently prescribed drugs include Biktarvy, Atorvastatin Calcium, Hydrochlorothiazide. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Marek Piszczatowski, FNP accept Medicare?
Marek Piszczatowski, FNP appears in CMS Medicare data with 1,006 Part D claims and 52 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Marek Piszczatowski, FNP's credentials?
Marek Piszczatowski, FNP's NPI is 1508312034 with credentials FNP. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) — 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.