2026 NPPES data Emergency Medicine Physician NPI 1346295045 MD
Verify on CMS →

Nathan Andrew, MD

Emergency Medicine Physician in Boise, Idaho.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 64,463 in Emergency Medicine Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
259
Medicare Part D claims · 185 beneficiaries · Emergency Medicine Physician avg: 352
MIPS score
83.3/100
▲ 0 pts above national avg 83.1 · Above neutral
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Nathan Andrew, MD reported a CMS MIPS final score of 83.3/100 - above the 83.1 national average - and filed 259 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

83.3/100
MIPS score · +0 vs avg
259
Part D claims, 2023
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Nathan Andrew, MD's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure

83 42nd percentile higher than 42% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). This entry sits in this band. 90+: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Nathan Andrew, MD sits

This provider among emergency medicine physician peers

Across the 14,967 emergency medicine physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Nathan Andrew, MD writes more Part D claims than 73% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 32% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePart D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 98Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 98Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Nathan Andrew, MD-Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one emergency medicine physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Nathan Andrew, MD. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Nathan Andrew, MD practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Nathan Andrew, MD?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 05/23/2006

NPI 1346295045

Primary specialty

Emergency Medicine Physician

High-volume

64,463 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

259 26% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 352

MIPS final score

83.3/100 0.2 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Idaho

How Emergency Medicine Physician compares to other specialties among Idaho providers

Idaho providers
Pharmacist - 5.4%Pharmacist5.4%Physical Therapist - 5.3%Physical Therapist5.3%Mental Health Counselor - 5.2%Mental Health Counselor5.2%Social Worker - 5%Social Worker5%Clinical Social Worker - 4.4%Clinical Social Worker4.4%Family Medicine Physician - 3.8%Family Medicine Physician3.8%Emergency Medicine Physician - 0.9%Emergency Medicine Physician0.9%
Largest specialties in Idaho (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Nathan Andrew, MD's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Emergency Medicine Physician national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
83.3/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Emergency Medicine Physician) - 83.3/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%83.3%
MIPS final score (Emergency Medicine Physician) - 83.3/100 vs national avg 83.1
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Nathan Andrew, MD appears in the CMS NPPES registry as an Emergency Medicine Physician provider holding MD credentials at 190 E BANNOCK ST, Boise, ID, 83712, with a listed phone of (208) 381-2222. NPI 1346295045 was issued on 05/23/2006.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 259 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 185 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $6K in drug spend, with an opioid prescribing rate of 13.9%. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 83.3/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 79.5, Cost 64.9), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Emergency Medicine Physician is a high-volume specialty nationwide, with 64,463 enrolled providers across 56 states and an average of 352 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline.

Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

190 E BANNOCK ST
Boise, ID 83712

Provider Details

NPI 1346295045
Specialty Emergency Medicine Physician
Credentials MD
Gender Male
NPI Issued 05/23/2006

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

83.3209
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
79.5148
Quality
64.8883
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

259
Total Claims
$6K
Total Drug Cost
185
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
259
Total Day Supply
2,244
Generic Drug Cost
$2K
Opioid Claims
36 (13.9% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
78

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
71.3 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.61
Gender Split
57% female / 43% male
Age Distribution
<65: 37, 65-74: 65, 75-84: 61, 85+: 22

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Nathan Andrew, MD prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen
Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen
25
Cephalexin
22
Ondansetron Odt
Ondansetron
17
Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Potass
Amoxicillin/Potassium Clav
14
Prednisone
14
Azithromycin
11
Dicyclomine Hcl
11

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Emergency Medicine Physician Overview

How Nathan Andrew, MD fits within the Emergency Medicine Physician landscape nationally.

64,463
Emergency Medicine Physician Providers in US
56
States with Emergency Medicine Physician
352
Avg Claims per Provider

Nathan Andrew, MD's 259 claims are below the specialty average of 352.

Nearby Emergency Medicine Physician Providers in Idaho

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Idaho, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Andrew.

Compare Emergency Medicine Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Idaho medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Emergency Medicine Physician peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Nathan Andrew, MD's specialty?
Nathan Andrew, MD specializes in Emergency Medicine Physician and practices in Boise, Idaho. Credentials: MD.
How much does Nathan Andrew, MD prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Nathan Andrew, MD wrote 259 Medicare Part D claims totaling $6K in drug costs for 185 beneficiaries.
What is Nathan Andrew, MD's Medicare quality score?
Nathan Andrew, MD has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 83.3/100 (Quality: 79.5, Cost: 64.9). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Nathan Andrew, MD located?
Nathan Andrew, MD is located at 190 E BANNOCK ST, Boise, ID, 83712. Phone: (208) 381-2222.
What is Nathan Andrew, MD's NPI number?
Nathan Andrew, MD's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1346295045, issued on 05/23/2006.
Does Nathan Andrew, MD prescribe opioids?
Yes, Nathan Andrew, MD had 36 opioid claims in 2023 with an opioid prescribing rate of 13.9%.
How many Emergency Medicine Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 64,463 Emergency Medicine Physician providers across 56 states in the US. The average Emergency Medicine Physician provider writes 352 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Nathan Andrew, MD prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Nathan Andrew, MD's most frequently prescribed drugs include Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen, Cephalexin, Ondansetron Odt. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Nathan Andrew, MD accept Medicare?
Nathan Andrew, MD appears in CMS Medicare data with 259 Part D claims and 185 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Nathan Andrew, MD's credentials?
Nathan Andrew, MD's NPI is 1346295045 with credentials MD. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.