PlainDoctor

2026 NPPES data Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician NPI 1295705697 MD
Verify on CMS →

Todd Engen, MD

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician in Provo, Utah.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 2,421 in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
257
Medicare Part D claims · 160 beneficiaries · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician avg: 92
MIPS score
86.1/100
▲ 3 pts above national avg 83.5 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$88.67
3 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Verify NPI on CMS Methodology
Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

What the federal data shows

Todd Engen, MD reported a CMS MIPS final score of 86.1/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 257 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

86.1/100
MIPS score · +3 vs avg
257
Part D claims, 2024
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)
≥49th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Todd Engen, MD

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1295705697), first enumerated 01/26/2006.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 257 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 86.1/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Board certification signal

    Heuristic suggests board-certified status based on ABMS-eligible specialty taxonomy plus active CMS participation signals — not a direct ABMS verification.

    Source: NUCC taxonomy + CMS participation heuristic

  • Reported

    Industry payment transparency

    $88.67 in reported industry payments (3 transfers) in 2024 under the federal Sunshine Act — disclosed transfers of value, not a quality rating.

    Source: CMS Open Payments

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1295705697 · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician

NPI-10 · ENUM-LEGACY · TAX-NARROW · MIPS-INLINE · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1295705697
  • ENUM-LEGACY 2006
  • TAX-NARROW 2,421
  • MIPS-INLINE 86.1/100
  • RX-LIGHT 257
  • BOOK-THIN 16 in Utah
  • PHOTO-FINISH Robert Schulz · ±0.1

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Todd Engen, MD's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

86 ≥ 49th percentile 49% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). This entry sits in this band. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Todd Engen, MD sits

This provider among plastic and reconstructive surgery physician peers

Across the 261 plastic and reconstructive surgery physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Todd Engen, MD writes more Part D claims than 87% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 56% - placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.448.873.297.7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Todd Engen, MD, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 56
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one plastic and reconstructive surgery physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Todd Engen, MD. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

✓
Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Todd Engen, MD practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Todd Engen, MD?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 01/26/2006

NPI 1295705697

Primary specialty

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician

Niche

2,421 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

257 179% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 92

MIPS final score

86.1/100 2.6 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Utah

How Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician compares to other specialties among Utah providers

Utah providers
Behavior Technician13%Clinical Social Worker6.3%Community Health Worker5.9%Case Manager/Care Coordinator5.7%Counselor4.7%Student in an Organized Heal…4.5%Plastic and Reconstructive S…0%
Largest specialties in Utah (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Todd Engen, MD's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
86.1/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%86.1%
MIPS final score (Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician) - 86.1/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

1735 N STATE ST
Provo, UT 84604
(801) 379-2900

Provider Details

NPI 1295705697
Specialty Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician
Credentials MD
Gender Male
NPI Issued 01/26/2006

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

86.1356
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
72.2712
Quality

Reporting: Individual

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Todd Engen, MD. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$89

Largest payer

Pacira Pharmaceuticals Incorporated

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

257
Total Claims
$3K
Total Drug Cost
160
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
271.533
Total Day Supply
3,388
Generic Drug Cost
$3K
Opioid Claims
70 (27.2% rate)

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
74.0 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.02
Gender Split
64% female / 36% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Todd Engen, MD prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Erythromycin
Erythromycin Base
101
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen
Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen
69
Neomycin-Polymyxin-Dexameth
Neomycin/Polymyxin B/Dexametha
34
Tobramycin-Dexamethasone
Tobramycin/Dexamethasone
14
Gentamicin Sulfate
 12

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

More Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician in UT → All providers in Utah → Compare specialties →

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician Overview

How Todd Engen, MD fits within the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician landscape nationally.

2,421
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician Providers in US
54
States with Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician
92
Avg Claims per Provider

Todd Engen, MD's 257 claims are above the specialty average of 92.

Nationwide Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Engen, both outside Utah so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (86.1 here).

Robert Schulz 86.2 HI Kevin Day 86.2 OR Christopher Tokin 86.3 HI Ewa Komorowska-Timek 86.4 MI

Same NPPES enumeration year (2006)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Christian El Amm Oklahoma City, OK Eric Khairalla Chevy Chase, MD Stephen Goldstein Englewood, CO Nirutisai Graff Ephrata, PA

Nearby Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician Providers in Utah

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Utah, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Engen.

One of 16 Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician providers enrolled in Utah, 5 are shown here.

Jayant Agarwal
Salt Lake City, UT
Dr. David Clayton
M.D., F.A.C.S.
Sandy, UT
Dr. Kimball Crofts
M.D.
Lindon, UT
Dr. Paul Deramo
M.D.
Provo, UT
Dr. Lauren Florence
M.D.
Salt Lake City, UT

Compare Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Todd Engen, MD's specialty? ▼
Todd Engen, MD specializes in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician and practices in Provo, Utah. Credentials: MD.
How much does Todd Engen, MD prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
In 2024, Todd Engen, MD wrote 257 Medicare Part D claims totaling $3K in drug costs for 160 beneficiaries.
What is Todd Engen, MD's Medicare quality score? ▼
Todd Engen, MD has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 86.1/100 (Quality: 72.3). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Todd Engen, MD located? ▼
Todd Engen, MD is located at 1735 N STATE ST, Provo, UT, 84604. Phone: (801) 379-2900.
What is Todd Engen, MD's NPI number? ▼
Todd Engen, MD's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1295705697, issued on 01/26/2006.
Does Todd Engen, MD prescribe opioids? ▼
Yes, Todd Engen, MD had 70 opioid claims in 2024 with an opioid prescribing rate of 27.2%.
How many Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician providers are there in the US? ▼
There are 2,421 Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician providers across 54 states in the US. The average Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician provider writes 92 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Todd Engen, MD prescribe most often? ▼
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Todd Engen, MD's most frequently prescribed drugs include Erythromycin, Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen, Neomycin-Polymyxin-Dexameth. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Todd Engen, MD accept Medicare? ▼
Todd Engen, MD appears in CMS Medicare data with 257 Part D claims and 160 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Todd Engen, MD's credentials? ▼
Todd Engen, MD's NPI is 1295705697 with credentials MD. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.