2026 NPPES data Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program NPI 1518351758
Verify on CMS →

Vania Leung

Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program in Chicago, Illinois. This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers — including 331,761 in Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration — see our methodology.

Federal data — no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is — no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
2K
Medicare Part D claims · 152 beneficiaries · Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program avg: 459
Generic prescribing
82%
generic claims · 17% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
87.1/100
▲ 4 pts above national avg 83.1 · Above neutral
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Vania Leung reported a CMS MIPS final score of 87.1/100 — above the 83.1 national average — and filed 1,634 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

87.1/100
MIPS score · +4 vs avg
2K
Part D claims, 2023
82%
generic prescribing

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) — no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Vania Leung's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023 — the federal quality measure

87 Top 46% higher than 54% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). This entry sits in this band. 90–100: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Vania Leung sits

This provider among student in an organized health care education/training program peers

Across the 12,645 student in an organized health care education/training program providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Vania Leung writes more Part D claims than 87% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 51% — placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume — percentile in specialtyMIPS quality — percentilePart D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality — percentile: 70Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality — percentile: 73Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality — percentile: 98Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality — percentile: 80Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality — percentile: 68Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality — percentile: 7Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality — percentile: 28Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality — percentile: 55Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality — percentile: 52Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality — percentile: 35Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality — percentile: 50Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality — percentile: 70Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality — percentile: 2Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality — percentile: 8Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality — percentile: 65Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality — percentile: 95Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality — percentile: 20Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality — percentile: 22Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality — percentile: 48Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality — percentile: 43Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality — percentile: 82Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality — percentile: 67Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality — percentile: 83Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality — percentile: 12Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality — percentile: 75Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality — percentile: 60Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 57Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality — percentile: 10Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality — percentile: 33Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality — percentile: 97Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality — percentile: 45Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality — percentile: 60Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality — percentile: 25Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality — percentile: 98Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality — percentile: 3Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality — percentile: 37Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality — percentile: 77Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality — percentile: 93Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality — percentile: 0Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality — percentile: 57Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality — percentile: 40Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality — percentile: 27Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality — percentile: 78Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality — percentile: 22Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality — percentile: 47Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality — percentile: 18Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality — percentile: 38Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality — percentile: 90Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality — percentile: 15Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality — percentile: 5Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality — percentile: 63Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality — percentile: 40Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality — percentile: 30Vania Leung — Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality — percentile: 51
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one student in an organized health care education/training program peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Vania Leung. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Vania Leung?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 03/25/2015

NPI 1518351758

Primary specialty

Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program

High-volume

331,761 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

1,634 256% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 459

MIPS final score

87.1/100 4 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Illinois

How Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program compares to other specialties among Illinois providers

Illinois providers

Largest specialties in Illinois (% of in-state providers)

Clinical Social Worker — 5.2%Clinical Social Worker5.2%Physical Therapist — 5%Physical Therapist5%Mental Health Counselor — 4.5%Mental Health Counselor4.5%Speech-Language Pathologist — 4.2%Speech-Language Pathologist4.2%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program — 4.2%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program4.2%Pharmacist — 4.1%Pharmacist4.1%
Largest specialties in Illinois (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance — MIPS

Vania Leung's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
87.1/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program) — 87.1/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%87.1%
MIPS final score (Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program) — 87.1/100 vs national avg 83.1

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Vania Leung appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program provider at 2600 S MICHIGAN AVE STE 205, Chicago, IL, 60616, with a listed phone of (312) 949-9199. NPI 1518351758 was issued on 03/25/2015. Because NPPES data is self-reported by the provider and refreshed monthly, the address, phone, and specialty reflect what Leung most recently submitted to CMS rather than a vetted directory listing, which is why patients should always confirm the practice is still at this location before scheduling.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 1,634 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 152 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $280K in drug spend, split 17% brand-name and 82% generic by claim count, with an opioid prescribing rate of 0.9%. These figures capture only Medicare Part D — commercial insurance, Medicaid, and cash-pay prescriptions are not included, and any drug-beneficiary cell under 11 is suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 87.1/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 70.8, Cost 52.8), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program is a high-volume specialty nationwide, with 331,761 enrolled providers across 55 states and an average of 459 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist — always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

2600 S MICHIGAN AVE STE 205
Chicago, IL 60616

Provider Details

NPI 1518351758
Specialty Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program
Gender Female
NPI Issued 03/25/2015

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

87.0887
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
70.7998
Quality
52.8291
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Vania Leung bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" — a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

The Board OF Trustees OF The University OF Illinois
Chicago, IL

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

License & disciplinary context — Illinois IDFPR 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only — NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~42K Illinois medical licensees in 2023 — they are NOT specific to Vania Leung. To verify Vania Leung's current license status, search the IDFPR public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

106
Total board actions, Illinois 2023
Across 103 cases
2.52
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Illinois statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
38 cases

IDFPR publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Illinois disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Vania Leung — brand share 17.0%
Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program average

17% brand-name claims vs 82% generic, on 1,634 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

1,634
Total Claims
$280K
Total Drug Cost
152
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
3,643
Total Day Supply
105,720
Brand vs Generic
17% brand / 82% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$249K
Generic Drug Cost
$30K
Opioid Claims
14 (0.9% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
30

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
77.4 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.89
Gender Split
64% female / 36% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Vania Leung prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Atorvastatin Calcium
148
Amlodipine Besylate
145
Lisinopril
103
Losartan Potassium
82
Metformin Hcl
72
Pravastatin Sodium
69
Eliquis
Apixaban
60
Tamsulosin Hcl
40
Hydrochlorothiazide
38
Omeprazole
36

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program Overview

How Vania Leung fits within the Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program landscape nationally.

331,761
Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program Providers in US
55
States with Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program
459
Avg Claims per Provider

Vania Leung's 1,634 claims are above the specialty average of 459.

Nearby Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program Providers in Illinois

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Illinois, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Leung.

Compare Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry — providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Illinois medical board — federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only — they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Vania Leung's specialty?
Vania Leung specializes in Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program and practices in Chicago, Illinois.
How much does Vania Leung prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Vania Leung wrote 1,634 Medicare Part D claims totaling $280K in drug costs for 152 beneficiaries.
What is Vania Leung's Medicare quality score?
Vania Leung has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 87.1/100 (Quality: 70.8, Cost: 52.8). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Vania Leung located?
Vania Leung is located at 2600 S MICHIGAN AVE STE 205, Chicago, IL, 60616. Phone: (312) 949-9199.
What is Vania Leung's NPI number?
Vania Leung's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1518351758, issued on 03/25/2015.
Does Vania Leung prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Vania Leung's prescribing is 17% brand-name and 82% generic drugs by claim count, with $249K in brand drug costs.
Does Vania Leung prescribe opioids?
Yes, Vania Leung had 14 opioid claims in 2023 with an opioid prescribing rate of 0.9%.
How many Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program providers are there in the US?
There are 331,761 Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program providers across 55 states in the US. The average Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program provider writes 459 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Vania Leung prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Vania Leung's most frequently prescribed drugs include Atorvastatin Calcium, Amlodipine Besylate, Lisinopril. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Vania Leung accept Medicare?
Vania Leung appears in CMS Medicare data with 1,634 Part D claims and 152 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Vania Leung's credentials?
Vania Leung's NPI is 1518351758. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) — 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.