Opioid Prescriber Share by State (2024): Mississippi Leads at 41.56%, DC Lowest at 19.58%

A 2024 analysis of CMS Medicare Part D data measuring one consistent metric across 56 US states and territories: the share of each state's prescribers who wrote at least one opioid prescription, from Mississippi's 41.56% to the District of Columbia's 19.58%.

According to the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), PlainDoctor compiles more than 7 million U.S. healthcare-provider records, a registry maintained since May 2007, adding Medicare Part D prescribing from 2023 and CMS MIPS quality scores from 2024 where reported, which you can search and compare; our methodology documents every federal source.

Research period:

Research Question

How often do the doctors and other clinicians in a given state prescribe opioids at all? To answer that with one consistent yardstick, this analysis measures the opioid prescriber share in each state: of all the clinicians who billed Medicare's Part D drug benefit, what percentage wrote at least one opioid prescription during the year. That share lets us compare a small state against a large one fairly, because it adjusts for how many prescribers each state has. The headline question is which states sit at the top of that ranking, which sit at the bottom, and where the most populous states fall in between.

Methodology

We drew on the federal record of every clinician who prescribed under Medicare Part D, the prescription drug benefit that covers tens of millions of older and disabled Americans. For each of the 56 states and territories in that record, we counted two things: the total number of clinicians who prescribed any drug, and the smaller number who prescribed at least one opioid. Dividing the second figure by the first gives the opioid prescriber share, expressed as a percentage. We then ranked all 56 jurisdictions by that share, from highest to lowest, and looked separately at where the largest states landed so that population size would not distort the picture. Every figure cited below comes from the most recent program year of that federal release.

Findings

Mississippi leads the nation: 41.56% of its prescribers wrote opioids

Mississippi sits at the top of the ranking. Of the 10,451 clinicians who prescribed under Medicare Part D in the state, 4,343 wrote at least one opioid prescription, a share of 41.56%. CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File, 2024 That is the highest figure among all 56 states and territories in the data, and it means roughly two in five of the state's prescribers reached for an opioid at some point during the year. The states clustered just behind Mississippi tell a similar story rather than an isolated one. Kansas comes next at 41.44%, Montana at 41.12%, Idaho at 40.35%, and Oregon at 40.31%. The closeness of these five figures suggests a regional and rural pattern rather than a single state acting as an outlier.

What unites the leading states is less a matter of any one prescriber and more a matter of practice mix. States with a higher concentration of pain management, surgical, and rural primary care practices tend to show a larger fraction of prescribers who write opioids, even when the typical patient receives a modest quantity. A high prescriber share does not by itself indicate overprescribing; it indicates breadth, meaning that opioids are part of a wider circle of clinicians' prescribing rather than concentrated among a few specialists. Readers who want to see the underlying clinicians can browse the Mississippi provider directory for the people behind these counts.

Highest opioid prescriber share by state (2024)

Share of Part D prescribers who wrote at least one opioid prescription

1. Mississippi - 41.56%1. Mississippi41.56%2. Kansas - 41.44%2. Kansas41.44%3. Montana - 41.12%3. Montana41.12%4. Idaho - 40.35%4. Idaho40.35%5. Oregon - 40.31%5. Oregon40.31%

The District of Columbia anchors the bottom at 19.58%

At the other end of the ranking, the District of Columbia shows the lowest opioid prescriber share among jurisdictions with a sizable prescriber base. Of its 4,902 Part D prescribers, 960 wrote at least one opioid, a share of 19.58%, less than half the rate seen in Mississippi. CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File, 2024 New York follows closely with a 22.43% share, drawn from a far larger pool of 101,454 prescribers of whom 22,761 wrote opioids, and Puerto Rico sits near the same level at 22.65%. These low-share places tend to be dense urban or institutional environments where prescribing is concentrated among specialists and large health systems, leaving a smaller fraction of the overall prescriber population writing any opioids at all.

It is worth dwelling on why the District and New York look so different from Mississippi. A 19.58% share in a city dominated by academic medical centers reflects a prescriber population weighted toward specialists who may rarely write a controlled substance, alongside large primary care groups that manage pain through other routes. The contrast with the rural-leaning states at the top of the list is one of medical culture and provider composition, not a simple verdict on which place is safer. Anyone comparing the two extremes can review the New York provider directory alongside the high-share states to see how the underlying clinician counts differ.

Lowest opioid prescriber share by state (2024)

Share of Part D prescribers who wrote at least one opioid prescription

District of Columbia - 19.58%District of Columbia19.58%New York - 22.43%New York22.43%Puerto Rico - 22.65%Puerto Rico22.65%New Jersey - 26.96%New Jersey26.96%California (largest state) - 31.45%California (largest state)31.45%

California, the largest state, sits squarely in the middle at 31.45%

California has by far the most prescribers of any state, 139,399 in all, and that scale makes it a useful reference point. Among those clinicians, 43,845 wrote at least one opioid, giving California an opioid prescriber share of 31.45%. CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File, 2024 That places it near the national middle of the 56-jurisdiction ranking, not at either extreme. It is neither a high-share state like Mississippi nor a low-share one like the District of Columbia. The point matters because raw counts can mislead: California writes an enormous absolute number of opioid prescriptions simply because it has so many prescribers, yet on the share metric that adjusts for that size, the state is unremarkable.

This middle position is the central caution of the whole analysis. A state's total prescription volume and its prescriber share are two different things, and confusing them produces false rankings. California's large volume reflects its population, while its 31.45% share reflects how broadly opioids are prescribed across its clinician base, a figure that turns out to be close to typical. The honest reading is that the most populous state in the country prescribes opioids at a middle-of-the-pack rate once you account for how many doctors it has.

Reading the spread: from 41.56% to 19.58% across 56 jurisdictions

Taken together, the 56 states and territories span a range from Mississippi's 41.56% down to the District of Columbia's 19.58%, a gap of roughly twenty-two percentage points. CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File, 2024 The top of the list is rural-leaning and regionally clustered, the bottom is urban and institutional, and the largest states by prescriber count tend to settle in the middle. No single state behaves as a lone outlier; instead the ranking traces a gradient shaped by provider mix, regional medical norms, and the kinds of conditions each clinician population treats. The most useful way to read any individual number is in the company of its neighbors, which is why this analysis presents the leaders, the trailers, and the large-state midpoint side by side rather than in isolation.

What this analysis cannot tell us

This measure counts whether a clinician wrote any opioid prescription at all, not how many they wrote or in what doses, so a state where most prescribers write a single cautious prescription can look the same as one where they prescribe heavily. The figures cover Medicare Part D only, which means they leave out prescriptions paid by Medicaid, commercial insurance, and cash, and they therefore lean toward an older and disabled patient population. States with fewer prescribers can show more year-to-year movement simply because small denominators are more volatile. Differences in provider mix, such as a heavier presence of pain specialists or surgeons in one state versus more primary care in another, shape the headline share without saying anything about whether prescribing was appropriate. Finally, a high or low share is not a judgment of safety or quality; it describes how broadly opioids are prescribed, not the clinical outcomes for the patients who received them.

Sources